research is currently being carried out on this area. materials which work better at room temperature and have similar properties to a semi conductor are already being developed. giveit another 25-30 years we may have some. who knows.....
2006-11-06 07:26:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
particular. If we get a superconductor that works at room temperature, it would easily substitute the civilization. yet, notwithstanding if we don't get one for the room temperature use, it somewhat is no longer a great difficulty for the scientists. because of the fact what we easily seem for now's the value of intense modern-day density (Jc) in a undeniable superconductors. In easier words, Jc promises the quantity of modern-day a superconductor can carry without dropping its sensible residences! And in the direction of this end, particularly some progression has been made. We already have many superconductors that artwork at liquid nitrogen and better temperatures (yet no longer at room temperature), that are being exploited in many distinctive techniques in many fields, beginning from scientific to scientific and technological makes use of. Now, the 2d part of your question: it somewhat is no longer elementary to respond to this in this variety of limited area, yet of direction, study is on. Scientists international huge try distinctive diversifications and combos of distinctive components... it somewhat is a separate field of fabric technological awareness. optimistically, some day we are able to easily get one at room temperature! (seek the internet for extra training).
2016-10-21 09:11:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's possible. On ancient years, a superconducting material is achieved only when it's temperature is absolute zero. Now there have been superconducting materials at higher critical temperature. Sooner somebody can devise superconductors at even higher than room temperatures.
2006-11-07 01:54:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Treat 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is interesting that progress on room temperature superconductors hasn't been made since the '80's.
Also, why hasn't 11 dimensional string theory produced anything?
It is possible that lying, paranoid, know nothings - that work for the 21 organizations spying on the public with plain clothes agents - exist in science and technology work.
2006-11-06 07:23:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
We'll get there... so long as someone remembers to pay the physicists for something more useful than 'how long is a piece of string' (theory).
2006-11-06 07:32:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by mesun1408 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess so although our understanding of type II HTS is incomplete. Once we get a better picture of what is going on.
2006-11-06 07:43:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mark G 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi. I think so. We just need to do better chemistry and physics work.
2006-11-06 07:22:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cirric 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
what's a superconductor?
2006-11-06 07:30:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by jimmyc1163 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Probably not. It is a general axiom of life that you never get something for nothing.
2006-11-06 07:26:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Randy G 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
yes
2006-11-06 07:21:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by come2turkey:) 2
·
0⤊
0⤋