English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

26 answers

I do not think that he should be impeached. But if he were, it would be for violating the Constitutional rights of US citizens by wiretapping their phones without a warrant from a judge. Wiretapping without a warrant is a federal crime, punishable by up to 5 years in prison.

I would not impeach him, however. He needs to concentrate on running the country. But come Inaugeration Day, 2009, I'd have a couple of D.C. police at the Capitol to take him into custody. He did, after all, violate the law.

2006-11-06 06:53:55 · answer #1 · answered by Chredon 5 · 1 1

President Bush should most definitely be impeached. If the Democrats win, then they will probably ote to impeach. It is high time he paid for the crimes he has committed. He should definitely be charged with crimes against humanity.

2006-11-07 10:15:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't know, but he is one funny guy to watch. I love stupid presidents they make some good comedy, although he does have a really annoying laugh so maybe he should be impeached for that.

2006-11-06 15:02:16 · answer #3 · answered by MATTHEW A 2 · 1 1

If Bubba Clinton didn't get impeached do you really think that George will? At this point it would be a major waste of the tax payers money. Let's not forget 9/11 and it's ramifications.

2006-11-06 14:48:39 · answer #4 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 2 2

It would be a waste of time. There is too much work to do repairing the damage he has done at home and abroad.

History will impeach Bush in its own time. He descendants can live with the shame.

2006-11-06 14:47:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

There's really no grounds at this point. If the Dems win the Congress look for investigations to find a reason, but it will do little good. He'll be out of office before the investigations could be completed.

2006-11-06 14:47:09 · answer #6 · answered by MEL T 7 · 2 2

Yes he SHOULD but its not worth the trouble to actually do it.

He should be impeached for violating and abusing the powers of the President's office in enumerous ways.

2006-11-06 14:48:22 · answer #7 · answered by thehiddenangle 3 · 1 3

Yes. For every word he said in the 2003 State of the Union Address when he lied to the world about WMD's then sent our troops in to a war of choice without justification based on lies he knew about and helped cook up. That should be about enough for an impeachment dont you think?

2006-11-06 14:48:48 · answer #8 · answered by haydenr93 1 · 1 4

I was hoping someone here had at hand the 15 +/- Federal crimes that for which Fed.Judge Taylor says that Dumbya is indictable. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!

2006-11-06 14:55:35 · answer #9 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1 1

No, but the lunatic left and the demon-crats will try.

He's commited no crimes, and the ones he is accused of are non-existant.

He has given the American people no lie, yet some accuse him of this, even though his words were echoed BEFORE he was in office by... *shocker* DEMONCRATS!

2006-11-06 14:49:29 · answer #10 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers