Gotta have circumcision done due to medical reasons?

Question

I would like to know if urologist have their own technique for having the surgery done personally id like my circumcision done as tight as possible with not to much lose skin is there any way i can request it done like this? please let me know and thanks to everyone who helps!

Answer 1

there are very very very few medical reasons to circ...find another doc get a second opinion or a third. a tight circ can lead to sexual dysfunction later...basically the skin for expansion during an erection needs to come from some where and it comes from the under side and pulls the testicles up the shaft.along with hair this is odd and unnatural. circ is a gross American fetish for doctors to make $$ off of. most of the world is not circed. find a European doc. they rarely recommend circ for anything. and sex with an intact male is much better...they are better lovers...less ramming...less drying out...easier on the woman's body. think about it natures not that wrong. a foreskin is suppose to be part of normal sexual activity. stop all this circ nonsense. even in the USA circ is dropping off...and with more people learning the painful (yes it is very painful) truth they are not inflicting it on their children.

Answer 2

There are very few medical reasons for circumcision, but if it is truly required, then you should let the doctor do what he thinks best.

You do know that you will lose a lot of sensation? Not only the 6 square inches of nerve endings in the foreskin itself, but also the head will grow a protective layer of insensitive keratin after the operation. You may have problems climaxing during sex, though you can always finish off by hand.

The last thing you should worry about is having it tight - if they make it too tight, you will have painful erections and will not be able to reach your full length.

Answer 3

I suggest you do some more research into the supposed medical reasons. The medical reasons for circumcision are: frostbite, gangrene and advanced cancers. Any other problem is treatable in far less invasive ways. American doctors are way too eager to amputate this body part, rather than cure whatever affliction you may have.

A high and tight circumcision will leave you with painful, SHORTER erections with the possibility of hair on the shaft and curvature of the penis.

Answer 4

No i do not. There is no "religious reason" other than that the person joined a big fat cult, that medical treatment should be seen as "against the rules." I believe in God, i also believe that he *can* and does "heal" if he wants to, BUT doctors and medical technology are NOT evil, and I personally think it is an offense to the Almighty when someone rejects medical help because they are waiting for "Divine Intervention" .... sometimes i just want to scream "That Medical Procedure/Medication *IS* Divine Intervention you idiot!!!" *sighs* But some people never learn. I do not think going to see the Doctor is sinful or violates any "religious Law" such as the eating of meat with the blood still in it, sex during ones period, and a plethora of others ... BUT i do think it violates the God-given common sense and good judgment as well as makes a disgrace of said "faiths." While there is some truth to the old saying, "Physician, Heal thyself" insofar as to state, that regardless of how advanced we as human beings become in our knowledge, God is still God. And that God can do the impossible when all of the possible has expired, there should never be any reservations about seeking out help when it is possible and available to do so. The truth of the situation, is that only CULTS dissuade their followers from seeking medical attention. Any truly religious person, who knows doctrines and the Bible well would and could tell you, that The Medical Field is a blessing, advances in science and medicine are a blessing, and though God can and does "heal" miraculously, (if He could not do it He would not be God) it is more of a disgrace to Him to ignore what He has put here for our well being, namely Doctors, Medications and Medical Procedures that save lives and better the quality of current life. Does that make sense? xoxo ♥

Answer 5

You have every right to ask the urologist what you want. It is important because the sexual feelings of the circumcised penis are in three places: the glans (head), the frenulum if you want to keep it and it has not been torn, and the whole shaft. The circumcised penis gives you total sexual sensitivity. I recommend a tight cut. Circumcision is not a mutilation. Medical reasons for it are perfectly valid and necessary.

Answer 6

Are you sure? Read and RECONSIDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Listen to "Hypermama", the poster above.





The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$

MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!

In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
Also, if you examine the bible, lest just say that is full of terrible things that are considered very illegal nowadays, and many of those terrible things are AGAINST WOMEN. Women, how would you like it if those things get legalized?
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Women are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. It is not a birth defect! A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And what is even greater is the chance of breast cancer so the best thing to do is to remove the breast glands of young girls or at least remove them at the first sign of trouble without trying any alternative treatments first in order to preserve the breast(women, how do you like it now?). And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens. The frenulum is the G SPOT in men.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html

Answer 7

THEY WOULD PROBABLY NUMB YOU THEN SNIP THE FORESKIN, IT WILL SAFE YOU FROM CANCER