Well said. Saddam Hussein's execution would only be just if all his Western supporters, who knew what Saddam was allegedly doing, provided Saddam with the tools to continue his activites, all perish with Saddam Hussein. Therefore, I would also like to see all of Saddam Hussein's original Western supporters and croonies: George Bush senior, Donald Rumsfeld and his pals, Thomas Gage - Tony Blair and his imperialistic British bunch, Francis Smith - George Bush junior (for unnecessarily sacrificing the lives of innocent civilians), Dick Chenney and, perhaps, Colin Powell - guilty by association - all perish on the day Saddam Hussein dies!
2006-11-06 07:10:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by L'Afrique 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You seem to be included in a certain crowd.. all without expressing any knowledge of what you speak.. Congress (90%) gave the green light to the invasion. That had to take place before Bush or Blaire could go forward... The repeated rhetoric by the left just doesn't hold any weight. Must remember, a half truth is the same as a lie.
2006-11-06 15:10:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Think of it this way. Yes Bush and Blain both decided to attack the "wrong" country, but they were saving thousands of lifes by doing so. Have you ever been too Iraq let alone seen what Sadam was ordering his militia to do to the men, women, and children who refused to follow him. How would you like it if someone ordered your closest friends and loved ones to be raped and killed? How about if you didnt have the freedom to study the religion you liked? Exactly, why should Bush or Blair get hung for doing what so many of our soldiers have done in the past. Provide Freedom.
And believe me Im not a republican, but I do agree with us being in Iraq, even if we went over on false pretences.
And for all ya'll that think about nothing more than Bush and Blair telling a couple lies, you should realize that every Ruler does it, thats how this world goes round.
If civilians knew the truth they couldnt handle it.
2006-11-06 06:47:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
there is somewhat one want for melancholy. it somewhat is an powerful anti depressant drugs. melancholy comes from a checmical imbalance indoors the neurotransmitters and the innovations and not something indoors the international will alleviate until at last you grab up on it. the astounding drugs will do it. as quickly as you're depressed, you on the instant can't have interaction with a therapist by potential of potential of talking or be with or around every person so talk scientific care won't paintings. Being around people is a waste by using certainty the lack of ability of activity makes it difficult to tolerate business enterprise business enterprise and back, verbal interaction. you will have no want for pets or looking after animals by using fact it quite is merely too hard work in intensity, too complicated and your innovations can no longer take care of it. Excercise demands motivation which you have none. until at last you ought to snatch up on the chemical imbalance it somewhat is inflicting the melancholy and rigidity, none of those innovations are sensible.. as at as quickly as as you regain your experience of motivation and desire to do subjects, somewhat then can any interaction or activity in all danger help experience good.. There are ssri's, snri's mao inhibitors and trycyclic anti depressants. some paintings greater proper than others observing the individdual. it quite is complicated until at last you detect one that suits good with tolerable section outcomes. If none of those are ever an decision, attempt ect (ask your self scientific care)l
2016-12-28 14:32:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For goodness sake. I am not bothered by politics but lets be honest anyone with an ounce of sence can see that you are talking twaddle..
saddam is an evil man who deliberately set out to kill thousands and thousands of his own people. he enjoyed and deliberately ripped families apart and leading his country by terrorising intimidating and scareing his people. whatever you thinkof blair and bush they do not do that. they are trying to lead their countries as best they can, and have never delibertely killed anyone.
anyone who thinks differently is just living in their own world!and not thinking of this clearly and objectively
2006-11-06 06:30:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by sianmog 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
i agree, but it will never happen. Bush is a power, he rules the world, Blair is scared of him. If Bush was involved with 9/11 then imagine what else he has up his sleeve.
Saddam got caught the others are still rulers and theres nothing we can do about it
2006-11-06 06:24:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by cazmo 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
It will never happen. But if we were going to kill them we should find a better way than hanging. After what they've done hanging's too good for them.
2006-11-06 06:29:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Deathwish 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
It depends upon who you ask this question. BTW, these two men are not on trial. Saddam wasn't an angle too.
2006-11-06 06:20:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You sound like John (the comedian) Kerry. Maybe we should have also hung Lincoln, FDR, Harry Truman and LBJ. Unfortunately, the left already hung Nixon in the 70's.
2006-11-06 07:29:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by baywitch 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
No i dont believe one shud take a life for a life
At least here in the UK we are civilised and have removed the death sentence perhaps one day other countries will be as civilised.
2006-11-06 06:20:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by kirsty d 2
·
1⤊
1⤋