English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Every Beatles Album after 1965.
Every Bob Dylan Album ever..


Seriously though, that's a hard topic to pin down: It probably Affected pop culture more than will ever be admitted; more people smoked up AND inhaled than will ever admit to doing...

Trying googling "Marijuana and pop culture in the 1960s)


And WHOSE Pop Culture?
America's?
Europe's?
Britain's?

2006-11-06 06:04:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The effect to Pop culture was total. If we hadn't of had it, the culture wouldn't have occured. However, finding an official report that would acknowledge such responsibility will be tough. Try the Pop cultures Spokesman, "The Rollingstone" Magazine, and see if you can go thru their archives on line.

2006-11-06 06:11:48 · answer #2 · answered by Marcus R. 6 · 0 0

faux. Trashed is even as there are cities made from cardboard, and cat nutrients is being bought commonly to people. they in basic terms upped our favourite of residing into the stratosphere is all. finally we are going to come to words with the actual shown actuality that we won't be able to stay the extravagant existence-type they were given to and are available decrease back to something a touch more effective sustainable.

2016-11-28 20:27:05 · answer #3 · answered by plyler 4 · 0 0

In 1972, President Richard Nixon's National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse recommended that Congress adopt this policy nationally in the United States. Since then, more than a dozen government-appointed commissions in both the U.S. and abroad have recommended similar actions. None of these commissions have endorsed continuing to arrest and jail minor marijuana offenders. Summaries of these studies are available here.

Since 1973, 12 state legislatures -- Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and Oregon -- have enacted versions of marijuana decriminalization. In each of these states, marijuana users no longer face jail time (nor in most cases, arrest or criminal records) for the possession or use of small amounts of marijuana. According to national polls, voters overwhelmingly support these policies. In Oregon, voters recently reaffirmed their state's decriminalization law by a 2-1 margin in a statewide referendum.

More than 30 percent of the U.S. population lives under some form of marijuana decriminalization, and according to government and academic studies, these laws have not contributed to an increase in marijuana consumption nor negatively impacted adolescent attitudes toward drug use. Summaries of these findings are available here.

Enforcing marijuana prohibition costs taxpayers an estimated $10 billion annually and results in the arrest of more than 734,000 individuals per year -- far more than the total number of arrestees for all violent crimes combined, including murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. This policy is a tremendous waste of national and state criminal justice resources that should be focused on combating serious and violent crime. In addition, it invites government unnecessarily into areas of our private lives, and needlessly damages the lives and careers of hundreds of thousands of otherwise law-abiding citizens. NORML believes now, as former President Jimmy Carter told Congress in 1977, that: "Penalties against drug use should not be more damaging to an individual than the use of the drug itself. Nowhere is this more clear than in the laws against the possession of marijuana in private for personal use."

2006-11-08 11:56:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

look it up at yahoo or any other web sit just type in marijuana in 1960's

2006-11-06 06:02:01 · answer #5 · answered by shorty 89 1 · 0 0

By googling.

2006-11-06 06:01:19 · answer #6 · answered by Everyman 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers