English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
32

If Neil Armstrong was the very first person to land on the moon in the existence of mankind then who was taking his picture when he jumped off the ladder?

2006-11-06 05:41:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

11 answers

A camera was mounted on the leg of the lander. It was activated upon landing.

1) Twelve 12 American astronauts have walked on the moon.

Apollo 11: Neil Armstrong & Buzz Aldrin
Apollo 12: Pete Conrad & Alan Bean
Apollo 13: << failed to land on the moon >>
Apollo 14: Alan Shepard & Edgar (Ed) Mitchell
Apollo 15: David Scott & James Irwin
Apollo 16: John Young & Charles Duke
Apollo 17: Eugene (Gene) Cernan & Harrison Schmidt


2) Why haven't we been back?

a) American astronauts visited the moon on six occasions.

b) The "moon race" was an extension of the cold war. It was mostly about national prestige. We got there first and achieved our primary objective. There was some good science: surveys, measurements, sample collection. But it was mostly about being there first. Once we achieved our primary objective, there was no political will to go back. There still isn't. Perhaps, if we discover He3 or something else valuable, there will be.

c) I used to travel to Crested Butte, Colorado every year to ski. Because I don't go anymore, does it mean that I never went?


3) What about the Van Allen radiation belts? Wouldn't it have killed the astronauts?

The existence of the Van Allen radiation belts postulated in the 1940s by Nicholas Christofilos. Their existence was confirmed in *1958* by the Explorer I satellite launched by the USA.

The radiation in the Van Allen radiation belts is not particularly strong. You would have to hang out there for a week or so in order to get radiation sickness. And, because the radiation is not particularly strong, a few millimeters of metal is all that is required for protection. "An object satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminum will receive about 2500 rem (25 Sv) per *year*."

"In practice, Apollo astronauts who travelled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and received a harmless dose. [6]. Nevertheless NASA deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimise the radiation." When the astronauts returned to Earth, their dosimeters showed that they had received about as much radiation as a couple of medical X-rays.


4) The U.S. government scammed everyone?

In 1972, there was a politically motivated burglary of a hotel room in the Watergate Hotel in Washington, D.C. There were only about six or eight people who knew about it. However, those people, including Richard M. Nixon, the President of the United States, failed to keep that burglary a secret. It exploded into a scandal that drove the President and a number of others from office.

If six or eight people couldn't keep a hotel room burglary a secret, then how could literally thousands of people could have kept their mouths shut about six faked moon landings? Not just one moon landing, but six of them!


5) What about the USSR?

Even if NASA and other government agencies could have faked the six moon landings well enough to fool the general public, they could NOT have fooled the space agency or military intelligence types in the USSR. The Soviets were just dying to beat us. If the landings were faked, the Soviets would have re-engineered their N-1 booster and landed on the moon just to prove what liars Americans are. Why didn't they? Because the landings were real and the Soviets knew it.


6) Why does the flag shake? Where are the stars?

Take a look at the first two websites listed below. They deal well with all of the technical questions.


7) Finally, please tell us what you would accept as definitive evidence that the six moon landings were real. Is there anything?

2006-11-06 05:45:58 · answer #1 · answered by Otis F 7 · 6 2

Its been proven time and time agin, we did land on the Moon. May I also remind you that there was 6 Moon Missions that landed on the lunar surface during the Apollo era. None of these Apollo Moon Landing's were hoaxed. I will discuss and disprove the conspiracy theories you may be familiar with. Think about it logically; The spacecrafts were definitely launched by NASA, which is difficult to fake. Second the Apollo crafts could NOT have orbited the Earth for 8 days as some of the conspiracy theorists have claimed. If NASA had of done that they would have been caught on their lie, especially if they did it six times. The Russians tracked the Apollo missions very closely and they knew for a fact that none of the missions were faked. If they only had the slightest clue that the Moon Landing was faked it would have been the ultimate propaganda weapon for use against the US and to Capitalism. The flag waves because it was planted in the soil and Armstrong twisted the poles. This is obvious because in other footage you can see the flag is not moving when he walks past it. Also the reason there is no blast crater beneath Apollo 11 is because when the craft landed it reduced speed upon landing on the Moon's surface, so all that it did was blow away dust. The same is with driving into a car park because you don't drive in at 30 miles an hour. Over 3 quarters of a million people were working on the project in total. It would have been impossible for every 1 of them to keep a secret. Even filming the landing would have been MORE DIFFICULT than landing on the Moon itself. Think about the number of people they would have needed to shoot the Moon landing in a film studio. Lastly if the Moon Landing was faked, we would have found out years ago. These things don't last 41 years without an answer.

2016-05-22 04:41:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A camera operated without the assistance of a human? Impossible!

The more interesting question deals with the fascination that complete morons have with technical matters which are obviously far beyond their own understanding. If you can't think of a logical answer to a technical question as inane as the one you posed here, you won't ever understand anything about the Apollo program on any meaningful level at all. Go find a new hobby.

2006-11-07 03:16:10 · answer #3 · answered by Edward S 3 · 4 0

Thank you Otis, now if all the gazillion other questions about the Moon Landing can be directed to your answer, but alas, we'll be seeing the moon conspiracy propagated by this ol' internet.

2006-11-06 07:53:17 · answer #4 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 3 1

Automatic, remotely operated video camera system attached to one of the lander legs. What's so difficult to comprehend about that?

2006-11-06 05:59:08 · answer #5 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 3 0

it was a camera mounted on a fold down shelf on the side of the lander....buzz lowered it before armstrong began the descent

2006-11-06 05:44:13 · answer #6 · answered by binary 2 · 7 0

The lander had cameras on it to make sure we could capture that historic moment.

2006-11-06 06:06:27 · answer #7 · answered by eri 7 · 2 0

Not another one! You people are slain and yet you keep coming.

2006-11-06 05:49:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Wallace (Grommit was also present)

2006-11-06 06:32:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

true and if you watch the tape of him on the moon the flag is moving and how can it move if there is air in space it would lie flat against the pole.

2006-11-06 06:24:26 · answer #10 · answered by missy 2 · 1 8

fedest.com, questions and answers