http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2333360.php
2006-11-06 04:59:14 · 6 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Should Bush even consider the opinion of the military?
2006-11-06 04:59:54 · update #1
This way we could never say they did not speak up.now is there anyone left who defends Rumsfeld.As for the president he is not a part of the discussion.HE REMINDS ME OF THE SAYING,"A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE IT ONLY WORKS WHEN OPENED"
2006-11-06 05:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by miraclehand2020 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Military Times is NOT connected to the military! It is an outside agency who happens to publish newspapers read, primarily, by service people. It is NOT the same thing as "Stars and Stripes" or the Armed Services Broadcasting Networks. Therefore, what the Military Times writes is NOT necessarily the opinion of the military. Let's tell the whole truth!
2006-11-06 13:04:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The legacy media left out the fact the Military Times is a private publication FOR the military, not BY the military. So, they're private editors just like the WP and NYT.
2006-11-06 13:08:44 · answer #3 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This isn't really the decision of the military, it is the decision of a single writer. The Military Times isn't endorsed by the Military, just like the New York Times isn't the word of all New Yorkers, and isn't endorsed by "New York". It's just some writer opinion, probably not even active in the military.
2006-11-06 13:02:46 · answer #4 · answered by straightup 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Who is the publisher? The publisher sets policy in his publication & doesn't have to agree with Bush.
2006-11-06 13:03:03 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no he dont have to he is the decider...not the american people
2006-11-06 13:01:11 · answer #6 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋