English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i think one can see very easily that microsoft didnt add trillions to world wealth simply by thinking of microsoft without human society, culture, science and world - without the science scientists universities tradesmen who feed the universities women who support the tradesmen by their underpaid labour etc - the whole of humanity - microsoft could actually do nothing without those other things - we are paying the tip of the iceberg for what the iceberg does - this wouldnt be so bad except it means that the pay to microsoft has to come from the rest of the iceberg: the 9/10ths of humanity have to be underpaid to fund this overpay - which then causes war, which is escalative, which has brought us to 60x kill-everything capability - justice is essential to survival - 1000s of years of rich get richer has brought us to the superextreme injustice [injury] & violence & tyranny & slavery of pay from $1 to $1 billion a fortnight - isnt this true? isnt this allimportant? isnt this the way out?

2006-11-06 04:51:17 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

1 answers

No, but its a better place with them. Its easy to hate the rich and successful isn't it. If you don't like them just use Linux, Firefox, etc.

(...and go back on your meds -- your rants are all a little ridiculous)

2006-11-09 09:29:52 · answer #1 · answered by Zee 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers