i think one can see very easily that microsoft didnt add trillions to world wealth simply by thinking of microsoft without human society, culture, science and world - without the science scientists universities tradesmen who feed the universities women who support the tradesmen by their underpaid labour etc - the whole of humanity - microsoft could actually do nothing without those other things - we are paying the tip of the iceberg for what the iceberg does - this wouldnt be so bad except it means that the pay to microsoft has to come from the rest of the iceberg: the 9/10ths of humanity have to be underpaid to fund this overpay - which then causes war, which is escalative, which has brought us to 60x kill-everything capability - justice is essential to survival - 1000s of years of rich get richer has brought us to the superextreme injustice [injury] & violence & tyranny & slavery of pay from $1 to $1 billion a fortnight - isnt this true? isnt this allimportant? isnt this the way out?
2006-11-06
04:51:17
·
1 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture