Robert E. Lee????
2006-11-06 04:50:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Okay, if you're going to try insulting everyone you hate, at least learn history, would you?
Robert E. Lee was never a dictator. He was not even the leader of the Confederacy. He was a general, nothing more.
As someone else has already said, try living in a nation ruled by a known dictator for awhile and say a word or two against him... You'll quickly find that George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan are/were not dictators.
In addition, you'll find that conservatives/republicans are NOT the murderous regimes that are the Taliban, gulags, baAthist regime, or racist like the neo-nazis.
2006-11-06 04:55:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Firestorm 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Who's Emperor Bush?
2006-11-06 05:05:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris J 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Asking a question in this particularly disorderly and evangelical place is probable no longer a thank you to get friendly suggestion. 0.5 the individuals are atheists, and loads of of the Christians refuse to have self belief that Catholics are Christian, in line with each and every form of propaganda. interior the U. S., there easily isn't lots reason to be alarmed, exceptionally if what you're apprehensive approximately is being abused. the U. S. Church has taken very strict measures to verify that the Church is between the main secure places to deliver your infants, mutually with historic past tests and fingerprinting for individuals who watch infants, besides as a direction on what adults ought to computer screen out for in stranger behaviour, and what behaviors to dodge to renounce any suspicion. in some way, i think of it ought to have made the Church a less warm place for infants, yet safety seems particularly sturdy. tremendously much each and every case reported interior the information regards a an prolonged time previous fee, maximum of them gay intercourse with older consenting minors, in spite of everything. Reception of those policies in different worldwide places is spotty, as they're oftentimes seen as overly harsh. sometimes, because of the fact they're, and others because of the fact some aspects the clergy ought to be in denial.
2016-12-10 03:39:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a sad question you ask. Everyone in the USA knows that in another 2 years we vote again for a new president that the rest of the world can bash, whether republican or democrat. An emperor will never relinquish his throne. So please do a little research about the differences. You think Bush is bad maybe the next president will be worse. Who knows til we get there.
2006-11-06 04:54:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bush could not possibly do so as he is an elected official and also subject to term limits. Comparing the republican party to the Taliban shows a large amount of ignorance when it comes to the important issues of our day and also when it comes to history and world issues.
2006-11-06 04:53:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by denim 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush is neither an emperor nor a dictator. Try living in a country ruled by a dictator & you'll learn the difference the 1st time you criticize that person.
2006-11-06 04:51:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Some of the dictators you list are much worse than Dumbya. Reagan was the second worst, but unfortunately ELECTED president. The worst elected was Nixon. I want to be fair and balanced. :-) Dumbya was NEVER elected. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-11-06 07:27:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I HATE Bush, but WOW, you really don't care for the man do you?
2006-11-06 04:51:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Joe 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You forgot Mussolini - lol.
Oh and the answer is YES.
2006-11-06 04:51:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gordie 1
·
2⤊
1⤋