What's wrong with it is that every number has two square roots. The validity of the manipulation √(xy) →√x√y is derived from the equality (xy)² = x²y². However, this equality also holds for (-xy)², so all you can really say about √x√y is that it is equal to ±√(xy). Thus, all you have managed to prove is that -1=±1, which is true, since -1=-1.
2006-11-06 02:14:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pascal 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Firstly please consider that in the 3rd line, sqrt[1] has two solutions, +/-1.
The logic is wrong in the third line going into the forth line.
sqrt[(-1)]sqrt[(-1)] = sqrt[1]
--> i x i = sqrt[1]
{squaring both sides in order to remove the sqrt}
i^2 x i^2 = 1.
Therefore that logic is incorrect
2006-11-06 10:30:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by ludacrusher 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
sqrt (1)=+/- 1
2006-11-06 10:12:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by . 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
sqrt[(-1)(-1)] can't b split into sqrt[(-1)]sqrt[(-1)] .........
as if done the answer will be + or - (i x i)
2006-11-06 10:12:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by tins 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hard to understand
2006-11-06 10:09:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
sq rt of -1 is indeterminate and so
sq.rt(-1)*sq.rt(-1) is not equal to sq.rt(1)
2006-11-06 10:18:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by raj 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
what is " i " ?
if i is a constant, (i x i) can never be -1...
because...
no matter i is a positive or negative constant, the answer will ALWAYS be a posititve value...
is it what you expected for the explaination?
2006-11-06 10:14:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by musical_bell 3
·
0⤊
4⤋