English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

thanks. and pleez dont "report me" i wanna know the answers

2006-11-06 01:22:32 · 9 answers · asked by coco 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

9 answers

I think he should. As for Iran and their nuclear ambitions. HELL NO!!!! The world is already dangerous. This man has already declared his hate for Israel and the wester world. Imagine if he actually had the weapons to do damage.

2006-11-06 01:29:51 · answer #1 · answered by Black Like A Tar 4 · 1 0

Saddam is going die , just as all the rest of us who are alive are bound to one day or the other,
Iran does have nuclear weapons thanx to Mush.

2006-11-06 09:35:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He should die of old age. I don't know how the British can pass laws abolishing the death penalty but then enthusiastically support it for Sadam. The news I read said he had people executed for conspiring to assasinate him. What do they expect him to do? What would George Bush do?

No country should have nuclear weapons, especially the USA which uses them to try to bully the whole world.

2006-11-06 09:32:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sadam should be incarcerated for life.Iran can have their power plant but what is safety in country suffering from earthquakes,besides is not nuclear energy another threat to the environment we are already raping with our endless quest for fuel and consumption of raw and other materials.
Since we are living in a perpetually degrading earth there is no longer any need for warfare or nukes.

2006-11-07 07:39:42 · answer #4 · answered by Michael V 4 · 0 0

Who are we to determine life or death? but this guy was a horrid soul in fact I don't hink that he had one! He has been reduced from an almighty and powerful leader to almost nothing! He has sat in a cell and rotted loosing all since of pride and dignity that should be punishment enough! He should cell within those four walls to think about all the evil he has done. He doesn't deserve the satisfaction of death, and plus hanging as a death penalty is unethical

2006-11-06 09:35:15 · answer #5 · answered by HeART oF GoLD 2 · 0 0

Saddam should die. He has nothing else to contribute to this world, i think. I don't think you want to see his resume.

No country should have nuclear weapons.

2006-11-06 09:39:26 · answer #6 · answered by Saffren 7 · 0 0

No to both. Do NOT make Saddam a martyr

2006-11-06 09:40:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no not from execution.... and yes...

2006-11-07 02:43:39 · answer #8 · answered by justaname80 3 · 0 0

HHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL YEAH

2006-11-06 09:31:32 · answer #9 · answered by ♥z-momme♥ 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers