2006-11-06 01:14:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
HE SHOULD BE ****** IN THE *** DUDE.
2006-11-06 01:16:51 · answer #1 · answered by Arun K 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
While I'm the farthest thing from being a "FAN",,, I have to suggest that his job is certainly more difficult and challenging than mine,,, and others in his position have made errors that go against most moral standards.
I also suggest that if the DEMS gain control of one or both sides of the govt...IE: House and Senate,,, TOMORROW by the way,,, Some talk of impeachment, in hearings, is likely to begin.
That may only serve to discredit US globally however?
The Bad news is that we have him in the office until Nov. 08, and then hanging out till Jan. 09. The GOOD NEWS might be KARMA,,, it gets all of us,,,good and/or bad.
To wish anyone the ill will you suggest might be a bit extreme, and certainly there are ways to express our communal disenchantment, beyond being a "Lynch Mob."
So in summation I suggest, "VOTE" on 11/07/06
Steven Wolf
2006-11-06 01:29:32 · answer #2 · answered by DIY Doc 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES, HE DESERVES THAT.
No matter what others would say about him being influenced by his old father or the vice president, as the President of the country he had all the power to do what HE wanted. He certainly is not a baby, but now I wonder whether he is not a little loose in the head. After all, old people do crazy things sometimes.....
2006-11-06 01:22:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I'm opposed to the way the war is being fought and to the president, but he should not be tried. If executives fear trial for their actions, they won't make the hard choice to protect the country. Like it or not, the best way to deal with this is to not reelect him (oops), or ensure that his party is punished for his mistakes in the mid-terms. That's the appropriate disencentive to commit heineous acts as a head of state.
2006-11-06 04:47:15 · answer #4 · answered by J C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
umm....yes.since it was an unnecessary war.
saddam was bad but he had nothing to do with 911 + had no wmd.the whole world said at the un they dont approve of war with iraq,but Bush in his infinate wisdom decided to attack anyway.
2006-11-06 01:23:57 · answer #5 · answered by forest lover 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
um no
what mass murders did he commit?
Its a war people die...Sadaam just killed because he wanted too!
2006-11-06 01:25:16 · answer #6 · answered by amanda b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course! Then sentence all of his cronies to 25 years in Gitmo! ;-)=
2006-11-06 01:23:04 · answer #7 · answered by Jcontrols 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
War is war , but killing Innocent civilians like Clinton did at Waco is a crime.
2006-11-06 01:18:06 · answer #8 · answered by samssculptures 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes
2006-11-06 01:34:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-11-06 01:16:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, interesting question.
2006-11-06 01:21:40 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋