.... if they want to hang Saddam, why not hang Bush too, he is 10 times worse than Saddam&Hitler together!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-06 01:06:27 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You should not be allowed to be outside alone. You are dumb as s**t. Hitler killed people because he didn't like them, not because they had tried to kill him or other people from his country for no reason other than that they were "infidels". The terrorists killed many, many American people simply because they believe that they should wipe us off the face of the earth because we don't believe what they believe. Bush is trying to protect his country and its people, not destroy others. If he didn't care about the other people over there, he wouldn't have sent his troops and would have just blown the whole place to hell and back. His protection allows you to make dumb a** comments - don't forget.
2006-11-06 01:24:41 · answer #1 · answered by hbennett76 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You really have to catch up with your History reading! Comparing Pres. Bush to Saddam and to Hitler is ridiculous! Do you even know anything about Hitler?
2006-11-06 01:12:40 · answer #2 · answered by Hamish 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that Bush is worse than Saddam or Hitler. But I do think that Bush IS A STUPID @SS MAN THAT TALKS LIKE HE HAS THE KNOWLEDGE OF A 6 YEAR OLD. HE STUTTERS EVERY 10 SECONDS AND I TRULY BELIEVE THAT ME AND YOU COULD DO A BETTER JOB AT BEING PRESIDENT THAN HIM.
GO KERRY!
2006-11-06 10:20:18 · answer #3 · answered by luv_barca 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are obviously misinformed. Hitler killed millions of people and was a vindictive murderous dictator. I place Sadam Hussein in the same category as Hitler, but I would not put President Bush anywhere near being a dictator, a murderer, or a vindictive person. Where are you coming from? If you like Hitler and Sadam better than you do your own president, let me make a suggestion - go move to N. Korea or Iran. They have dictators, and I am sure they would welcome you goof ball ideals with open arms. You had better thank your lucky stars for a free country and quit making stupid statements like you made in your question. You may not like Bush, but that is no reason to compare him to these two evil people of history.
2006-11-06 01:15:57 · answer #4 · answered by Doug R 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If you really suppose that Bush is a net detriment, you are too stupid to go out of doors without a keeper. Had Bush done nothing, Saddam would still be murdering Iraqis by the thousands, and without the Bush tax cuts, the treasury would be over $1,000,000,000,000 poorer.
2006-11-06 01:11:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hitler is the worse however, Saddam is very bad to.
2006-11-06 01:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by Texan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you were tied to a pole, and there was one lead pipe on the ground to beat you to death with, my money would be on Bush to reach it before Saddam and Hitler.
2006-11-06 01:10:58 · answer #7 · answered by dingdong 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Here's an idea...do you think you could be President? Honestly. Do you really think that you could take all of that responsibility, and shoulder it any better than Mr. Bush does? I think not. Keep this in mind while you're being ignorant and trashing the leader of our country: Hindsight is 20/20 my friend. You are no better.
2006-11-06 01:53:50 · answer #8 · answered by BeezKneez 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
there are quite some previous and present international leaders that fall into the evil class. No Obama isn't absolutely one of them! although i do not agree at the same time with his regulations i do not imagine he's an evil guy, particularly the opposite.
2016-11-28 20:14:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is wrong!!! Bush is trying to keep peace among the thousands of americans and when you mess with us americans you are to be punished all the same! Yeah they are bad people but think about this. Would you rather have one die than a hundred or Hundred die than one!?
2006-11-06 01:11:45 · answer #10 · answered by Angel Wings 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋