If bush was held accountable for his actions infront of an Iraq court judge and jury would he be found guilty?
Is his actions really that difference than Saddam?
Just your opinion please!
2006-11-06 00:40:03 · 8 answers · asked by ? 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
If is such a big little word. First, Bush will never be seen in Iraq. He sends other people to do his dirty work. Second, it is being said, true or not true, that Saddams fate was handed to him right before the US November elections. Third, as someone said yesterday, whatever Bush has done, nothing will happen to him except he will go back to Texas and he and his family will live the high standards of living that they are accustomed to. Bush has truly changed the fate of America, but he will pay no price for it.
Edit: Just what exactly did Saddam have to do with 911? Bush went after Saddam because he was an easy target. The Saudi's have way too much control over Bush for him to go after Bin Laden, the real perpetrator of 911. You are right, Saddam was an awful leader, I am no fan of his, but, Iraq has not been saved by George Bush. Iraq is a country in turmoil and on the verge of Civil War.
2006-11-06 01:05:22 · answer #1 · answered by emotional blonde 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No comparison between the two. Saddam was a brutal dictator who subjugated, tortured, illegally imprisoned, millions of HIS OWN PEOPLE for his OWN purposes. My he rot in He**!.
What did Bush do? HE isn't doing to the American people 1/100,000,000 of what Saddam did to his. Americans wouldn't tolerate such a dictator in our own country. Bush may have even orchestrated some deaths, but it was in defense of our policies or Constitution. And if you think that the Federal Government doesn't order executions like most organized crime does - think again - most governments do - on the QT!
Bash Bush for his ACTUAL failings, not what you THINK he did! What did he do, go into Iraq and RESCUED that country from that Hitleresque demon! Iraqis should be THANKFUL for that!
Saddam was ALWAYS a target of the US because of his ties to al Qa'eda and 9-11 sealed Saddam's fate along with the 9-11 perpetrators.
2006-11-06 01:13:36 · answer #2 · answered by LilacTigress 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can only hope. The most that will happen to Bush is the send him into retirement to live his Repbublican life of leisure as an ex-president. Maybe he can spend his days playing Golf with his Dad and Ford while Carter builds houses for the poor on the other side of town.
2006-11-06 00:46:17 · answer #3 · answered by Patrick B 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
a million. lookup the be conscious "systematically" interior the dictionary. 2. study the adaptation between mendacity and saying something that one believes to be actual that may no longer be actual. 3. to respond to your question.....No. in my opinion, this is an absurd and ignorant question. do no longer permit politics blind you....the guy leaves plenty to be needed in a president, yet he's not a ruthless tyrant...basically a president attempting to do something to alter the international for the extra desirable. regrettably people such as you do no longer comprehend what's we are doing in Iraq and why it has each little thing to do with battling terrorism and little to do with WMD's. The terrorists comprehend, the Democrats faux they do no longer, and maximum people do no longer. Please open up your concepts, take off the dislike glasses, prepare your self and treatment your self of lack of expertise.
2016-11-27 22:03:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! Saddam killed hundreds of thousands of his own people that's the difference. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
2006-11-06 00:44:10 · answer #5 · answered by Texan 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush is the worst thing ever appeared on Earth. "El peor, el peorcito en este planeta."
2006-11-07 04:41:36 · answer #6 · answered by Dieguito Maradona 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lisa Y you've said best!
2006-11-06 01:10:51 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Warped question!That's my opinion!
2006-11-06 00:44:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋