Instead of death sentence, lock them both up forever. Put Bush in a room with intellectual French radio programs on day and night.
2006-11-05 23:19:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ragazza 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
A public thanks from the Iraqi people for freeing them from Saddam.
The fact of the matter is no matter what the USA does half of the world is going to have a problem with it.When GW Bush invaded Afghanistan noone in the world community had a problem with it.We helped them in fighting the Soviets for ten years.The Soviets eventually pulled out of the IMPERIALIST war.Our reasons for invading were that they were harboring and abetting terrorists.
If you read enough of the world news like the poll I just took 71% of the people polled agreed with the decision to kill Saddam.This man was a tyranical,psychotic dictator with no regard for human life.His former country will be a better place once his cronies stop bombing market places and committing terrorist acts around that country.
That invasion was warranted.Since the time Clinton was in office the Iraqi government has been committing crimes against the US including trying to kill Bush sr.That's why Clinton had the military bombe the Iraqi Intelligence Office many years before our most recent endeavors.I think it's unfortunate that the world looks down upon us for doing theses things.Granted some of these plans were not the best executed but we have to worry about our citizens safety.Let's see how some of these other countries fel if a radical faction kills over 3000 people on their sovereign soil in an unprovoked holy war.Those people attacked us after we spent an entire decade helping them fight the Soviets.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061106/ap_o...
The most interesting and sad FACT of the matter is many countries not only supported us but joined us in these conflicts.France turned their backs on us for PURELY economic reasons.They would be speaking German right now if we didn't save their country in two world wars in which we and our allies were victorious.
Germany did the same thing and Italy pulled out of these conflicts cow tauing to the terrorsists after being attacked on their own soil.
I hope the educated will prevail and we can have peace everywhere.Noone likes all of this killing myself included.
2006-11-06 07:42:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by joecseko 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bush? Death punishment? Unlikely, he's in fact the man behind the scenes and he ain't a good guy, but as we all know it's impossible that Bush would receive capital punishment. He's still got those dogs supporting him, so as long as they are around, Bush would still be here. And I presume he would continue to do so and manipulate the system even he's done with his presidential term.
It's a matter of time, and one day....one day, he'll get it. This is between Bush and God. That dog we call president would not get away for the treacheries that he's caused.
2006-11-06 07:24:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tye 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
If Saddam is hanged, I think Bush will get a lot of trouble. I agree with what I think you are saying - that many people will think the same punishment should be given to him, and some of them will be interested in carrying it out. By fair means or foul!
I don't think it's a solution to the world's problems to kill people, and definitely not to make an example of leaders by killing them. I think it will just encourage more killing.
We should never forget that in warfare MANY of the victims are children, not just because they or their families are killed, but because they get involved in the war one way or another or incredibly psychologically damanged by what they have witnessed. Children are tomorrow's adults, and we should think about what trouble we are building ourselves for tomorrow.
2006-11-06 07:24:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by marblemelody 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
going by the international response after sept 11 and then the contradictory 'war on terror', bush is a criminal - they both have played major roles in the death of homeland and foreign land peoples. then again the usa is the only country found guilty of international terrorism by the World Court (you could simply blame regan but i do not think he is all to blame).
put em in a steel cage wrestling arena on worldwide t.v. - that would get high ratings i reckon
2006-11-06 07:52:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ozrasta 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't agree that they are equally evil. One is acting in the best of his country according to Bush and the other is just greedy, even the people he was meant to unite and work for their good cause as their former president, he just divided and ruled and gased.
Having said that, Almighty God is the ultimate judge. Atleast Bush is repentant and he will be forgiven
2006-11-06 07:33:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by simple me 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush does not deserve the death sentence.
Believe it or not, there are really weapons of mass destruction that were shifted from Iraq. No one knows where they are, but they are definitely real.
What Bish needs is prayer, since as a world leader, he took initiative in taking action against Iraq. Ask the Iraqi people who had to suffer under him. WHy would Bush waste so many US soldiers's lives in something frivolous? No President in the right mind would do that, or take action without having incriminating evidence.
As spectators who do not have access to inside happenings in the White House, it does not mean that there were never any WMD. We have to think before we pass comments on others who are doing their duty.
Try reading "Prophecy" by Victor Pearce.
2006-11-06 07:38:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Carla 3
·
1⤊
5⤋
Time will tell and he will surely meet his destiny sooner or later for all evil that he spreaded in the world. The justice of God Almighty is inevitable.
2006-11-06 07:21:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by hammad31 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Solitary confinement with a huge book of tongue-twisters (the correct way-up).
Feed him fish until he gains the sense of a primate.
Swap his carpets for quicksand.
Give him a zippo and a feather, then ask him which one is the lighter.
.
2006-11-06 07:30:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
He has never gassed anyone of his own people but yes him and Blair deserve some sort of punishment for there crimes of interference
2006-11-06 07:24:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ivan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋