English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-05 23:09:23 · 46 answers · asked by gareth_bancroft 2 in Politics & Government Politics

46 answers

David Hasslehoff.

2006-11-05 23:10:42 · answer #1 · answered by Raff 2 · 2 1

G,W,Bush of course or maybe im wrong,he is after all a Politician
and would do anything to stay in power.He basically hasnt a clue
about whats going on,but rather he just follows Orders,like a puppet on a string.America is Controlled by big Business corporations,Oil Cartels, The Armaments industry,Car Makers etc. There are many Shadowy Individuals Behind American
Politicians.Which makes it all the more worse.For years Europe
was Piggy in the Middle between America and the Soviet Union.
Under constant threat of Nuclear Annihilation.

2006-11-06 10:36:53 · answer #2 · answered by janus 6 · 0 1

There are two: Islamic fundamentalists and North Korea. Forget putting Bush in that list. To compare Bush to either is foolish. Bush isn't a threat, he's the Great Wrong Decider, making stupid choices. But Islamic martyrs and Kim Jong Il are where the threat is. Particularly if they get together.

2006-11-05 23:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0 1

definite. The threat from religious fundamentalists isn't basically coming from the Islamic worldwide, it is likewise emanating from the united states and Israel. The maximum efficient supporters of the Bush administration interior the united states are Christian fundamentalists who have faith interior the biblical prophecy that Jerusalem needs to return thoroughly under Israeli profession for the 2nd coming of Christ. This religious fundamentalist theory helps to gas the conflict interior the midsection East, on an analogous time as international media interest is distracted in the direction of the Islamic fundamentalist threat to worldwide peace. The threat from religious fundamentalists isn't basically coming from the Islamic worldwide, it is likewise emanating from the united states and Israel. The maximum efficient supporters of the Bush administration interior the united states are Christian fundamentalists who have faith interior the biblical prophecy that Jerusalem needs to return thoroughly under Israeli profession for the 2nd coming of Christ. This religious fundamentalist theory helps to gas the conflict interior the midsection East, on an analogous time as international media interest is distracted in the direction of the Islamic fundamentalist threat to worldwide peace. Professor Denis Brutus from the college of Pittsburgh interior the united states warned that what's occurring in that u . s . a . immediately is an quite risky attack on the liberty of the peoples of the worldwide. "there is interior the U.S. an substantial religious tension that has a particular pre-profession," he defined. "They use the Bible, the previous testomony, to declare that the top of the worldwide is coming. Armageddon (in northern Israel) is the place the basically good conflict will happen and the rapture will take all believers as much as heaven." "what's irritating," persisted the professor, "is that Jerusalem is on the centre of (this theory) and (the fundamentalists have faith) it relatively is going to be thoroughly under Israeli governance. This phase of the U.S. inhabitants is urging Bush to assist the Israeli government and the army to triumph over the full territory." Brutus stated that this Christian fundamentalist phase of the U.S. inhabitants has grow to be so efficient immediately because of the fact "they stole the (2000) elections" for Bush and that they have got have been given a president interior the White residing house with an IOU (I owe you). "religious fundamentalism is the main deadly evil we've immediately" Sherif Herata, an 80-3 hundred and sixty 5 days-previous activist.

2016-10-15 10:41:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the usa and us, I have looked at answers, this is not about oil, its not about anything other than bush pushing his weight around the middle east. Whether or not saddam was a dictactor is irrelevant, it was an excuse to go to war to finish what his father didn't have the nerve to do in the first place. I f bush senior had done it in the first place we wouldn't be in this situation now. Bush is a wimp, but his father was a even bigger wimp and that is the president we should be blaming

2006-11-05 23:23:26 · answer #5 · answered by richard_dargan 2 · 1 1

George Bush is the biggest threat to world peace today.

We're fighting two wars, threaten other nations, and we can't mind our own business. Globally, Bush is seen as a threat.

2006-11-05 23:13:23 · answer #6 · answered by Villain 6 · 9 1

the biggest threat to world peace are.george bush.islamic fundamentalist.israeli government.america right wing bible bashers.and greedy companys.and us for not taking any notice of what going on in how name

2006-11-05 23:24:23 · answer #7 · answered by peter o 5 · 3 1

Attachment in all its forms, which leads humans to identify with their likes, dislikes and egos. It can simply be identifying with a sports' team to the extent that you are willing to destroy property and beat other people to death cuz your team lost; or it can be identifying with a religious ideology or just identifying with your own demons and spending your life trying to vindicate yourself either by thinking you're a victim or an advocit for what SHOULD be perfect in the world and try to force others to live by your own judgements. In other words, it's not islamic fantacism, terrorism or communisim...these are all just labels...it's the human condition at its worst.

2006-11-05 23:18:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

People who lack the internal fortitude to the right thing. Those with selfish ambitions and greed as motivation. The uneducated who constantly spout name calling and insults as thought they were real information or of any consequence.

2006-11-05 23:14:32 · answer #9 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 2 0

The Republican president of the most powerful nation on earth with a moron's IQ of 70. Interestingly enough, when the news was talking about the mid-term elections in the US, a reporter was answering a question with 'The US electorate has moved on from Saddam Hussein' but the live subtitles said 'The US electorate has moved on from sane'.

2006-11-05 23:13:54 · answer #10 · answered by Uncle Sid 3 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers