2006-11-05 23:03:12 · 7 answers · asked by G.W.Bush 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Greetings!
You can't. Iraq was a sovereign nation. As such, what right did the US or any country have to invade them.
Certainly there will be some who might argue it was justified as per UN resolutions.
Yet we know many countries have resolutions passed against them and they do not get invaded.
This whole ploy was a simple invasion ordered and orchestrated by our President for the purpose of picking on the weakest kid on the block to prove a point.
When you look at the loss of life and chaos following the "Mission Accomplished", a reasonable person would begin to question how much of the so called madness of Saddam, was actually a leader who did what was necessary to control his country to a point where some semblance of peace existed.
Do you think for one minute the President of the US would not do the same?
Do you really belief you have the rights and freedoms in this country, that we supposedly fight to give others?
Also as an aside, I am sure you can see everyone there has a gun, from 5 years old and up. If Saddam was so bad, why didn't the people there revolt against him? Certainly they were armed well enough!
Good Luck
2006-11-05 23:18:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cannot be justified unless and independent judicial court under the control of International court of justice awards the punishment. He was caught by the international forces .So the biased court should not trial him. No head of the state who did injustice to the humanity should be tried in the same country but by the international committee of justice.
2006-11-05 23:09:51 · answer #2 · answered by mohandas m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America, is after the oilwells in the region so they have been suppying arms to him since a long time,to create uncertainty in the region which happened, as i result he became a dictator and one knows what becomes of a dictator the end is certain death.
2006-11-06 00:13:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million) India in no way had any difficulty in coping with Saddam formally. 2) He replaced into no longer a fundamentalist mutually as dealing with India and faith did no longer come interior the way of his dealing with family members with different worldwide places. 3) India is making professional-Saddam noise, basically to maintain p.c.. with the winning opinion interior the area. If India welcomes the sentence and make professional-American noise, we are able to be branded as an best buddy of the USA of a. you're able to have difficulty with the community Communists, whose help for the government is mandatory for its survival. you're able to have difficulty on your family members with u.s. and China and different Muslim worldwide places.
2016-10-21 08:36:50 · answer #4 · answered by avey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the " Final Answer " for the word "DICTATORSHIP".
you should think about what happened to "Adolf Hitler" "Mussolini"
and there are still some of them remaining in this world
Per............ Mus........
2006-11-09 01:15:50 · answer #5 · answered by Dev4u1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first off u did not sentence him the courts did and his finale
judgement will come from jehovah our lord
2006-11-05 23:17:02 · answer #6 · answered by purple_puma 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He who lives by the sword, also dies from it.
2006-11-06 01:14:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋