United Nations without United States?!!?

Question

We have heard too much about US and its power in United Nation and Security Council..But how does UN look ,if united states has not power in UN?.will UN's role going to be more active in order to protect international community and improve peace and security in the world?will Security Council going to cooperate and make better decisions? or perhaps chaos?!!.Thank you for your response..

How about others permenant members of UNSC like: CHINA,FRANCE RUSSIA,UK?.What do thy can or not can?

How about others permanents members of united nations security council UNSC like: CHINA,FRANCE RUSSIA,UK?.What do thy can or not can?

Answer 1

Well ,it is a good question.I believe that United Nations Security Consul has many obligations,in fact it is crated in order to prevent violations and atrocity and to keep peace and security in the world ,but unfortunately peace and security are not totally prevailed!in the world and we blame always US because it makes more decisions in UNSC. I think others permanent members in the counsel has responsibility too,we blame US, UK for there roll but in fact France china,Russia are also have did less or nothing for peace and security in the world which they should have done !!.and this is a big problem .of course it is right that US keep it,s interests but I believe without US ,there will be more dictators,terrorists,atrocity in the world. If we look the policy among different nations then we can understand that only US policy has significant diplomacy and bring nations to dialog which is in my view undeniable, it is all members responsibility in UNSC in order to functions be more acceptable.

Answer 2

Wow think of the money saved if the UN moved away. Can already picture the new condo development, and all those so called ambassador privileges revoked. The millions of dollars not spent else were but spent in the US instead. The soldiers that won't have to part of the UN forces. The treaties the US can just brush away, the nonsense of asking permission to do the right thing would just save time. Instead of humanitarian dollars going into the pocket of UN officials it might actually go to the people that is if we want it too. Sounds like a good idea to me.

Answer 3

Seeing that UN was primarily build on Wilson Woodrow's 14 points ( the collective security for example), there would not be a UN in the first if USA was not in power. Thus, and I think the UN hasn't been of much help so I think I'll be expecting chaos lol.....

Hope my answer helps, good luck :)

Answer 4

UN can not function effectively without US as it member
US still the world major arm power and UN needs it to ensure
all members keep peace between each others
UN only usefulness is that it will not approved war between nations disregard of race

Answer 5

What you have is a United Nation`s that cannot function with the US or without it. The UN can spend a week agreeing on a course of action on something, then you get the US saying, Um? Let Me See, Um? No. And thats that. No further action can or will be taken The power of veto should be abolished.

Answer 6

The UN is a paper tiger. If it we're not for the U.S.A. the UN wouldn't even exist. This whole idea of new world order will actually be a last world order.

Answer 7

The UN is UNable, UNwilling. UNeffective, UNclear. and just plain UNanything good, get US the hell out of the UN

Answer 8

I'd be thrilled to get [the US] out of the UN, and better yet, to get the UN out of us! We'll keep our money too.

Answer 9

Without USA veto = peace

Answer 10

the un is a failure and should be removed