English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why ONLY Saddam Hussein?. If JUSTICE is justice and all people should be getting JUSTICE, why not than these other people getting murdered in Africa by their leaders face JUSTICE. How come WE NEVER even talk about the causes of their crises, but we talk about "food shortages", and their civil wars, but NEVER talk about their causes, IT IS BECAUSE we support their leaders who are doing that. SAME THING WE DID for Saddam Hussein in the 1980's.

There are more SICK and BLOODY men out there than Saddam Hussein in Africa. All Saddam was DOING IS to protect his country from what it fell today, all the people he was killing and arresting were people who were co-conspirators who would either co-operate or work with the Americans which wanted Saddam dead. EVERY MAN HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HIS LAND, wasn't that the American idea too?.. Saddam didn't have a different view point than American one.

2006-11-05 20:31:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

7 answers

How do you defend Saddam killing something like 133 ppl in one town....in his OWN town. Defending his country? Get a clue...

2006-11-05 20:34:06 · answer #1 · answered by wcbaseball4 4 · 0 1

Based on this logic, Bush should be killed too. His imperialist policy, has killed thousands of innocent persons, he has erased entire towns where only families lived (Afghanistan) but of course nobody has the balls or the resources to make him face a trial for crimes against humanity. If Saddam is doomed that´s fine, but I wouldnt go and see in Africa or Middle East, Bush is one of the biggest criminals in history and the source why many countries have tensions with the USA. Its so hard to understand that Bush doesnt care about freedom in any other country, he cares about the money, the oil, the resources. Ask today to the world who would they prefer to see dead, Saddam or Bush? You will see that the states will have to look for a new president

2006-11-07 21:09:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Two major reasons:
Saddam did not cooperate with the big bullies as African and other "yes, sir" leaders are doing.

Most others don't have oil, the main attraction.

2006-11-06 05:25:54 · answer #3 · answered by peaceman 4 · 1 0

I agree with you they are others out they like Mubgee and the president of North Korea who also should be topple and face justice.

2006-11-06 04:46:18 · answer #4 · answered by jo k 3 · 1 1

Im glad with the outcome ,he should die ,enough ppl have suffered.There are plenty of dictators in the world that need to be knocked off ,sooner or later bush will get to it

2006-11-06 04:40:37 · answer #5 · answered by lakersfanatic132 3 · 1 2

well, america works on the principle of might is right. i hate bush for his Islam enemity

2006-11-06 04:47:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

he held together 3 tribes,see how hard that is today, iraq really was a can of worms that should not have been opened ,http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

2006-11-06 04:38:14 · answer #7 · answered by aqua 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers