Its people like you that fuel hatred, people, take a look at other questions.
2006-11-05 20:04:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mizzy 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Death and murder happens far more likely than we would like, but it has been a crucial element for progression. Take a look back at history, which nation has come to power through passive means? Very little, if any. The point is, however tragic it may seem, nations gain power through destruction and yes, the murdering of people. I'm sure that if you looked deep into the past, you will find someone who has killed more than Bush or Saddam, but who is chastizing those people?
2006-11-06 03:58:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by bloop87 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually yes, Bush looks like a monkey. Saddam deliberately did kill many of his own people. Now, it is Bush's policies that are getting people killed in Iraq. What Iraq needs is regional support from all its nieghbours. Thier nieghbours have to make firm commitments which would determine Iraq's future. Bush is not doing that. He is rather holding Iraq hostage, and it certainly is not a quiet hostage to handle. Peace.
2006-11-06 03:54:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zabanya 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you consider the millions of people who died in the Iran-Iraq war, I would say Saddam by 20 miles, at least.
2006-11-06 04:05:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steve P 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush leaves Saddam at the gate! And Mahmoud is gaining on him.
2006-11-06 03:50:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush hasn't killed anyone.
You sicken me that you would even suggest that he's more of a murderer than Saddam Hussein.
Saddam killed people with torture. He killed children in front of their parents and parents in front of their children. His crimes were the worst of all kind.
Bush has done NOTHING to be considered a "murderer". Civilian casualties always happen in a war. Get used to it.
2006-11-06 05:47:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by peddlersofdeth 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Maybe the world should just put all of America on trial! As we are the ones who keep allowing these men to ransack our own budgets earmarked for food, housing, and health care on guns to kill people elsewhere for oil, based on lies. It is as much America’s fault that GWBush is not on trial for war crimes now as anyone’s. It took decades to get Saddam to trial. Maybe in decades Bush will finally be on trial for his crimes being committed now. I can only hope that we Americans, and the world, find the relief and reparations of that trial someday. The Bush family should be required to pay back all those who died and suffered at their hands, from the homeless to the illiterate in America to those who died in Iraq, both American and Iraqi, not to mention all those killed by American made bombs dropped by American made planes in Contra killings in Central/South America, as well as those who lost their life savings in the Neil Bush S&L scandal, the list goes on and on…if we held the Bush family accountable for their deeds, it would be a healing trial for the world, indeed.
2006-11-06 03:57:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by dstr 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bush and Israeli and toll death still counting none stop.
USA people are second and still continue none stop.
Saddam is the third and it stop since he is a not a President anymore.
That means Bush and his supporters is responsible for eternity criminal around the world in the name war against terrorism.
2006-11-06 04:21:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
saddam time for pre school hurry before the short bus arrives
2006-11-06 07:07:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by IMPEACHED! 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Saddam killed people to stay in power.
Bush killed people to protect America & it's interests.
If you can't see the difference, get a brain transplant.
2006-11-06 03:51:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
saddam
2006-11-06 04:51:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by James y 1
·
1⤊
0⤋