English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seems like, sexual deviance runs rampant with in their party too, but they concoct excuses for the aberrant behavior or re-label and minimize the severity of it. In other words hypocricy reigns supreme. Are they judging with bias?

2006-11-05 18:41:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

Republicans hold Democrats to a higher standard than even the head of the Republican Party, George W. Bush.

George Bush's lack of exit strategy or any strategy at all for Iraq doesn't bother his followers at all.

At the same time they demand that the Democrats outline their strategy for Iraq in detailed terms.

2006-11-05 18:48:36 · answer #1 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 2 3

No-Republicans hold their own to a higher standard. When you're caught doing the unethical or improper-you're forced out of office (Foley). When we try to hold Dems to a similar level of standards--the libs excuse and forgive as though it never happened.

And to the poster above--Foley was caught sending dirty messages to a page--not having sex with anyone...............if a BJ is not sex, how is a 'dirty' email?

2006-11-06 01:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by Cherie 6 · 2 1

Yea, you could say this is hypocracy on the part of some Republicans.

But if you're going to talk about hypocracy, you'd better start with the Democrats. These are people who think it's o.k. to kill innocent unborn babies, but oppose the death penalty for murderous scumbags like Tookie Williams and Saddam Hussein.

2006-11-05 18:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by college_republicans_club 2 · 2 3

No they wouldn't want cooties! who knows where those dirty Democrats have been, The Republicans would need a clean stick for themselves.

2006-11-05 18:53:08 · answer #4 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 1 2

no they obviously dont but then again neither do the democrats (its called politics; these kind of things are a game to them)

2006-11-05 18:51:54 · answer #5 · answered by Ski_Bum 3 · 3 0

No I've always found them to be completely objective - as all politicians are required to be.

Hey thumbies, you mean that's not a requirement?

2006-11-05 18:48:17 · answer #6 · answered by Grist 6 · 1 2

My judge is neither democrat or republican. He is Jesus Christ.

2006-11-05 18:49:31 · answer #7 · answered by tmills883 5 · 2 0

Yes I do...and its funny you can say that about how many ppl? 10 or so? Out of? millions...yeah nice statistic.

2006-11-05 18:45:18 · answer #8 · answered by speefmoney4 3 · 2 2

Nope. Clinton had sex with a woman, lied about it, and got impeached. Foley solicited sex with a boy, lied about it, and got treatment.

2006-11-05 18:52:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers