English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I KNOW he was a ruthless dictator who killed many of his own citizens, but are we still hanging people in the 21st century? Is the death penalty not the irrevocable denial of one's human rights? Does an "eye for an eye" actually teach a lesson? Please, PLEASE honest and mature responses only.

2006-11-05 18:37:14 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

13 answers

Its too dam good for him. The guy deserves everything he gets. Don't feel sorry for him one bit. He should be tortured first and suffer the way he made others suffer. And when they get Ben Ladin he should get the same.

2006-11-05 18:46:16 · answer #1 · answered by part time 3 · 0 0

Its a matter of opinion. Some people support the death penalty, some do not. Some prefer the use of lethal injection, some do not care, some oppose death by any means. It all depends on what the individual believes. God said thou shalt not kill. I dont recall there being any exceptions in the ten commandments.
Me personally. I support the death penalty pretty much in any form. I saw the video of the terrorists beheading the civillians in Iraq. That was the most horrible, horrible thing I have ever seen. No horror movie special effects could have ever replicated that. If you have not seen the video it will kill part of your soul. Hanging may be a little bit primitive but he is a monster. What he did to the children in northern iraq warrants death. I saw the film footage taken after the gas attack. A small child laying dead in the street, clutching a doll in one hand and her dead mother's hand in the other. The monster should die.

2006-11-05 18:48:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iraqi law states that he MUST be hanged. He even requested that he go before a firing squad. There's no way around it. It'd be a ***** if he was the one who implemented that law, by the way.

I cannot BELIEVE we're discussing what's "humane" when it comes to executing him. There's NOTHING "humane" about executing anyone. They're still killing a man. And, actually, lethal injection is the most *IN*humane way to execute someone. It forces a heart attack and asphyxia, and if the anesthesia doesn't kick in (which is not at all uncommon in any situation, everyone reacts to it differently), you'll feel every bit of that. It's not a peaceful way to die at ALL. When you're hanged, if you're lucky, your neck will snap on impact and you'll be done that quick.

At what point does someone lose their "human rights?" I'd say somewhere around trying to commit genocide. I still think that locking someone up in a jail cell for the rest of their life is a much harsher punishment than death,. It'll be pretty hard for Saddam to "learn his lesson" when he's dead, won't it?

2006-11-05 18:54:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I had no issues of the pictures, he have been given a honest trial decrease than Iraq's judicial equipment. His sentence replaced into reviewed and then endured. I do think of it is going to no longer have been finished on the morning of a Muslim pageant, which will turn him right into a martyr for his specific sect and Hussein is no one's theory of any style of a sturdy guy or a martry. He murdered people at once in and out wars and had no grief approximately it. That being mentioned , this is why there are not from now on public executions in North usa because of the fact it enrages people on all components of the undertaking. It should not be a public spectacle, the persons and guards around Hussein shouldn't have been spewing comments at him, no remember what they considered him.They have been there to do a job and not make public remark no remember how they felt. in area of actuality that now supposedly some ten year previous youngster in Texas upon viewing it on the information tried brilliant himself and did. they're blaming the televised video of Saddam's brilliant yet extra desirable than probably the youngster replaced into attempting the choking activity and the mummy and dad do no longer % to think of roughly that so how plenty much less complicated this is accountable television and the Saddam brilliant. it relatively is totally unhappy the little boy died, yet while i replaced into ten I actually did no longer attempt to replica each little thing I observed on television and not in any respect a brilliant. this may well be the prospect people will take accountable media for exhibiting it and commencing extra revenge insurgency in Iraq. i myself desire they do no longer tutor us the different adult men being hanged, do in basic terms it and let us know you probably did it yet do no longer difficulty with the photos. If people have not got self belief they're lifeless this is their own difficulty.

2016-11-27 21:48:59 · answer #4 · answered by paschal 4 · 0 0

"An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind." -Ghandi
The death penalty is always wrong; I'm well aware that Saddam killed others, but I've always liked the line from For Whom the Bell Tolls "any man's death diminshes me for I am part of mankind." It isn't that what Saddam did wasn't evil, in fact it was evil. For me killing Saddam is another way to diminish myself and I don't want to diminsh myself any more than I've already been diminished by Saddam's genocide.

2006-11-05 18:48:20 · answer #5 · answered by jessetfan 2 · 0 0

Some would want a life sentence w/out parole .But when one is a
mass murderer of his caliber the general rules seem to get confused in the message they send out . I personally believe he gets off to easy with death by hanging... But my opinions aside the vast and horrific injustice of his crimes can never be balanced by any punitive action taken against him regardless. Justice can only ameliorate this by helping those survivors to establish a fruitful and rewarding life to come.

2006-11-05 19:08:15 · answer #6 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0 0

One thing to ask is why is Saddam to be hanged but somebody like Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe or Omar al-Bashir of Sudan gets off scot-free?

It seems to be uneven justice.

2006-11-05 18:41:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hang him......."eye for an eye" i believe does not teach a lesson, killing him is letting him get off the easy way, although he will be dead, it will be better for him to stay alive and suffer in a cell.....and be tortured

2006-11-05 18:46:51 · answer #8 · answered by phattygirl 3 · 1 0

It's somewhat paradoxical that a society commits murder as a punishment for someone who commits murder. In that case, isn't society guilty of the same crime that the accused is executed for? Makes no sense to me.

2006-11-05 18:47:25 · answer #9 · answered by Jolly 7 · 1 1

Nope, hanging good, injection good, bullet good . . .
Whatever gets the trash off the planet is goooood !

2006-11-05 18:48:11 · answer #10 · answered by kate 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers