English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And now with Haggart, how much more can we take of this?
About two more days worth?

2006-11-05 18:22:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Foley chasing 16yr old boys through the halls of congress in his underwear...etc

2006-11-05 18:22:41 · update #1

9 answers

Yes.
But there is not much 'love' involved. When the full truth is eventually publicly exposed, then the cult methods inolved are nit merely homosexuality, which is the tip of the iceberg.
Child sacrifices are also involved!!

For more details, see the Franklin Cover-up.
The Franklin Cover-Up by John DeCamp
educate-yourself.org/cn/franklincoverupexcerpt.shtml

2006-11-05 18:35:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

as quickly because of the fact the democratic operatives renounce, who sat on the recommendation till a month till now the election. And obstructed justice by utilising no longer revealing the recommendation to the government in a well timed way. the emails have been from 03' ! So a republican could renounce if he gets gay with teenagers, yet what some democrat? could he stay in place of work, win reelection after which retire thirteen years later? Congressman Studds, Democrat, MA did only that. with a 17 12 months old boy paige. double time-honored? or is there something appropriate to the liberal bastion of massachusetts that reelects admitted guy-boy enthusiasts? bypass lieberman

2016-12-17 04:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The man boy thing is a group called NAMBLA, North American Man Boy Love Association. A real sick and twisted group of pedophiles. NAMBLA's attorney of record ?? That would be the ACLU. Which party supports and is supported by the ACLU ?? That would be your beloved liberal Dems.

You should make sure that the window's open before you go throwing rocks.

2006-11-05 19:32:32 · answer #3 · answered by Cain 3 · 2 2

That's a liberal image and who doesn't know that ? Why would the tolerant left pick two gays to make fun of - when you normally look the other way when it comes to disgusting men abusing boys ? No platform-but that's ok democrats will make one up .What seems to be the problem- insulting the troops didn't work for you ?

2006-11-05 18:29:51 · answer #4 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 4 3

I don't care about our image but I do care about the young people affected by the pedophiles on both sides of the Isle, but Nancy Pelosi would like to keep the ones on the left , does your question mean you would like to keep Democrat pedophiles in office too?

2006-11-05 18:27:50 · answer #5 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 3 3

It must suck for you to go through life with so much hate based on uneducated responses to serious issues facing this nation. Your generalized statements are nothing more than a very good argument for the reform of education in the United States. Please open a book, please!!!

2006-11-05 18:30:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

HA HA HA. May be God told Bush that a little fun is allowed for supporters if work in Iraq is not hampered.

2006-11-05 18:26:25 · answer #7 · answered by jaco 3 · 3 4

what are you talking about almost all gay people are liberals and the ACLU defended the man boy love association and the ACLU is very liberal

2006-11-05 18:28:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

traditional values, indeed.

2006-11-05 18:58:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers