they just lose their jobs.. a regular person would go to prison.. so i think they should to...
and our , I mean, YOUR president sticks up for him hehe.
2006-11-05 18:08:12 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Don't look now, Dobbs, but your double-standard is showing.
Your party not only defended but gave THREE STANDING OVATIONS to and voted Gerry Studds into a chairmanship after he was censured for actually HAVING sex with a minor.
2006-11-05 18:12:34 · answer #1 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i'm genuinely torn about that one. i'd want to confirm a republican congress (i'm an independent in spite of the indisputable fact that I lean more effective contained in the route of repub) pondering the actual shown actuality that they are lots of the time more effective fiscally to blame (understand the word lots of the time). we want a balanced money and we'd want to initiate eliminating some waste, to not communicate about having that set of checks and balances works more effective even as not everyone seems on an same part. in spite of the indisputable fact that, having a conflict of interest between a congress and President makes concerns move a lot slower. what number sensible costs might want to be stalled or perhaps vetoed pondering the actual shown actuality that it became once proposed by the opposite part? If everyone in congress became once genuinely doing what they even although became once high quality for the rustic i does not mind it, in spite of the indisputable fact that how in a lot of situations has someone filibustered pondering the actual shown actuality that notwithstanding wasn't proposed by his social collecting? that is aggravating to computer screen. heritage has shown us that a govt managed by one social collecting does not confirm good for us, so i'd want to assert we want stability more effective than cooperation.
2016-11-28 20:05:29 · answer #2 · answered by laranjeira 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stereotyping an entire party for the actions of one is pretty closed minded. By the way, an 18 year old is considered an adult in all states.
2006-11-05 18:34:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nancy Pelosi stuck up for Gerry Studds when he was caught not merely soliciting an underage male, he was caught in the act.
2006-11-05 18:10:13 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Who here belives that it is okay to call yourself "Charles Dobson Focus On the Family" when you're not a conservative?
2006-11-05 18:11:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
That would be the party that supports gay marriage, unrestricted abortion and the aclu which defends NAMBLA, right?
2006-11-05 18:13:23 · answer #6 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋