English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

LOL- The USA can't even control Baghdad.

2006-11-05 16:26:43 · answer #1 · answered by drateRa 3 · 1 4

would you kindly provide us a itemizing of the 14 Muslim countries that you declare were invaded? enable me furnish you with the nicely perfect guidance. Saddam Hussein, then ruling Iraq invaded Kuwait and attacked Iran, both absolutely one of that were Muslim countries and so became Iraq. The Saudi Arab King and the King of Kuwait demanded that the individuals loose Kuwait and that further about the warfare adverse to Iraq. us of a did not invade Iraq, it freed Kuwait. the hot depending authorities of Afghanistan held the individuals to blame for the helping of the Taliban in the course of the chilly warfare and demanded that they nicely perfect the problem. American forces were despatched to assist the Afghan authorities in dealing with the problem. back, us of a did not invade Afghanistan. In Bosnia Herzegovina, the Serbs were slaughtering the Muslims thee and the individuals intervened with UN sanction. back, us of a did not invade Bosnia Herzegovina. Palestine and Israel were in conflict for a lengthy time period. us of a remains o entering that conflict. us of a secure convoys of UN help for ravenous human beings in Somalia. they did not invade Somalia. After that incident, they were replaced with British and Australian troops. Like human beings have already informed you, Mali has not something to do with us of a. So, tell me, the position are those imaginary Muslim countries that you declare are being invaded by technique of us of a? .

2016-11-28 20:04:00 · answer #2 · answered by laranjeira 4 · 0 0

This is like asking why fish run faster across the African veldt than gazelle?
The entire premise of the question is foolish. No country, including the US, has any interest in invading Islamic countries or butchering Islamic people. The US has 7.5 MM Islamic people living peacefully inside its borders.

The US quarrel is with radical jihadists, not Islam. Jihadists, who have killed far more innocent Islamic people than have US forces, hide behind the skirts of legitimate Islam

2006-11-05 16:34:44 · answer #3 · answered by artaxerxes-solon 3 · 1 1

Yeah they cannot control Baghdad even with the Stealth Technology the people often are seen bragging about.
Yes many of them say that they can "nuke" the place but
the rebels would go everywhere and the only killed will be the
innocent.It would cause the destruction of the west.They
cannot rule the world because Russia and China would not be very happy about that.

2006-11-05 16:31:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I truly hope that the USA will not be an aggressor similar to the Crusades of the Middle Ages. That would be stupid. Defend ourselves - of course but to be involved in a genocide would make us no different than Hitler.

2006-11-05 16:30:38 · answer #5 · answered by rokdude5 4 · 2 1

We don't need to invade any more countries, two is enough.
Most of the civilian dead in Iraq can thank their fellow Muslims
for arranging the meeting with Allah.

2006-11-05 16:40:45 · answer #6 · answered by Farnham the Freeholder 3 · 1 1

If the United States ISN'T successful in ending the Islamic radicals' demented ideology, what is next, indeed?

You might be willing to choose one of the Islamic terrorists' options - convert to Islam, or die - but I'm not.

2006-11-05 16:31:17 · answer #7 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 3

Anyone else who decides to knock down tall buildings.

2006-11-05 16:30:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

well with there success record on invasions i think the worlds pretty safe ...lol

2006-11-05 20:36:18 · answer #9 · answered by Bearable 5 · 1 0

Your own people will dispose of the worthless ideas and evil haters among you.

2006-11-05 16:39:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Peace!

2006-11-05 17:07:23 · answer #11 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers