English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is for a school project, so pleaaase help. Lotsa people would say he's immoral but then again there are tons of Bush lovers out there. Provide a general example please? Because there is so much stuff that Bush has done that it seems like a blur to me overall.

2006-11-05 15:28:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

16 answers

He is an ethical President. His only problem is not having the ability to clearly communicate what he is thinking.

2006-11-05 15:36:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

President Bush is a very ethical President .He can not be led astray and that's one of the many reasons democrats dislike him . He believes strongly that he was elected to do a job of protecting the American people . No matter how much democrats give aid and comfort to the enemy or trash our brave heroes , George W. Bush remains steadfast in his duty to America . Our economy is the best in years and now has beat all records in unemployment at a rate of 4% . He has had to govern under the worst imaginable conditions and does it well .He is a great leader .

2006-11-05 17:01:45 · answer #2 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0 0

There has been way too much unfair George W. Bush name calling and criticism, which as a conservative, and as a Christian has caused me to like him more and more, and dislike the name calling more. But I do know that he is a politician, and sometimes politicians bend the truth. Many conservatives call him a "fiscally liberal conservative" which means he's into spending alot, but is socially conservative (Pro-life).
I do not know of anything that he has done that's immoral except from when he was younger. The war in Iraq was not immoral, becuse he is only doing his job, which is to defend us from foreign threats. Like I said he has done some political speeches that have some rhetoric. I think sometimes he gets caught up in the mood of the moment and says something like "Mission Accomplished!" that might be misleading. Actually he is probably the most moral president that I've seen yet. Most presidents have lots of skeletons in thier closet. It seems like GWB is "what you see is what you get". You know all the stuff he did when he was younger, and you know that he's kind of loose with the facts sometimes, but other than that, I don't think you can really say he's immoral or un-ethical.

2006-11-05 15:35:52 · answer #3 · answered by The Bible (gives Hope) 6 · 1 2

Bush has gained extra effective complaint than the countless president in historic previous. He additionally has been extra effective available than the countless president. With the internet and all the cable tips channels the guy can now no longer take a drink of water without the entire usa awareness what temperature the water is. George W. Bush ought to be remembered for safeguarding this usa preserve after 9/11. very few presidents contained interior the previous have had to bypass by way of what Bush has. usual i think of of historic previous may be form to Bush.

2016-12-10 03:21:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He will go down in history as the unfunded mandate president.. He's spent between 4 and 5 trillion dollars and very little has gone into making our lives better... health care, alternative energy, prescription drugs, etc.. On any issue, his policies have been giveaways to the rich or have not been funded... If you would do a school project on political leaders who have lied about being Christians, george bush would be at the top.

2006-11-05 15:42:26 · answer #5 · answered by david n 3 · 0 1

Those words are far too complicated and diverse for George Bush. He's just stupid. That's all. I feel sorry for him because he's just used like a pawn by the people who really run this country. I am offended by the fact that someone so mentally unequipped and uncouth could be put in that position, but the "strategery" is there. Let's just hope the "dignitude" of America won't be further compromised by any more political machinations.

2006-11-05 15:32:30 · answer #6 · answered by Blackadder 2 · 1 1

I say he is ethical...i mean whats wrong with trying to protect our country???? We've foiled alot of terroristic attacks since 9/11 and blown up alot of terrorist training camps as well. Its not a coincidence that after 9/11 there hasnt been a single attack on American soil. War sucks...and it probably sucks deciding to go to war...but if its in the best interest of your country then its something you have to do. Where would you rather have this war? America, or Iraq? Had we not went there they would have kept attacking us and killing innocent citizens, I would rather him them before they hit us again. I mean you dont lose 3000 lives in one day due to terrorism and then sit back and just forget about it like the Dems are claiming they would have done (although in 98 a signed letter from 6-8 Dems including Joe Lieberman said that Iraq and Saddam were imminent threats and they believed they had WMD's, now they are all claiming they didnt say it). Dems flip flop trying to please everyone...deep in their heart they know it was completely necessary. Its not immoral to love your country and to send troops somewhere to prevent your countrymen from being attacked on our soil innocently............

2006-11-05 15:40:21 · answer #7 · answered by gwbgod 2 · 1 2

Good guy. Not immoral. Not the brightest speaker in the pack but watching out for us. There has been no terrorist attacks in this country after 9/11.



We can/will live with that.

2006-11-05 15:34:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Immoral. Recently, he claimed that he had never said "stay the course" in reference to Iraq. Alas, there is video proof of him saying it multiple times. Just as there was a denial that the administration linked Iraq to 9/11, but there is video proof of multiple people (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice) stating that exact thing.

2006-11-05 15:33:07 · answer #9 · answered by Your Best Fiend 6 · 3 2

I think he is ethical, in the sense that I believe he is following his conscience and what he believes to be good judgment, which is what we all should do, even if some people disagree with him or think he has done wrong or stupid things.

2006-11-05 15:30:57 · answer #10 · answered by catintrepid 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers