You know, I wondered that same thing.
It all has to do with the speed of light. As you approach the speed of light, time slows down. But if you compare the speed of even a plane to the speed of light it is really negligible. You might be gaining a few minutes at most when all is said and done.
2006-11-05 15:30:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by apuleuis 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
We're living longer but it's nothing to do with speed. We have far better medical care, healthier, more hygienic practices & technologies to make life easier & lengthen our life span than in the past. If you worked hard labour your whole life, walked ten miles everywhere, defecated in a bowl under the bed, bathed once a month & drank dirty water you probably wouldn't live as long as someone comfortably driving to each destination, sitting behind a desk drinking evian, with a clean bathroom to eliminate in and a shower every day. We're much less likely to get bubonic plague. Although they say there's a flu pandemic impending...Wash your hands!
As far as the speed theory goes (I don't think we can outrun death! Tee hee) & actually in some ways we're moving slower than in the past in terms of life cycle. In the past women might marry in their early teens, pop out 8 kids & be dead by 30 or 40. Now we marry later (if at all), have fewer children & live longer. Maybe it's the marriage that kills us! Tee hee
Seriously though, a lot of things that used to kill us off, we've found ways to circumvent. So nature has to find new ways to control the population. New diseases & disasters to contend with. But we have the means to prolong life now, even for the very ill. Never underestimate hygiene & medicine for keeping us alive! Maybe we can outrun death for a while!
2006-11-05 15:44:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by amp 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We're living longer now because of the prevention of deadly diseases that once plagued us, such as smallpox. It is the immunizations and the reduction in infant and child mortality that has driven the average lifespan longer, not so much that people live longer. Also, C-sections have nearly eliminated death during childbirth--a problem that once claimed many young women's lives.
People living a century or two ago had a pretty good chance of making it to 70, providing they made it to 60. Making it to age 10 was the real challenge.
So my answer is "No," the rate at which we move has not increased the length of our lives. Modern medicine has.
2006-11-05 15:35:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by sublimetranscendental 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not true. People in some parts of the world are living longer due to better nutrition and better medical care.
In poorer parts of the world, they can ride on trucks, fly on planes, and still die of old age at 35.
2006-11-05 15:30:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jim P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually the reverse is true. It's just that we have made great strides in medical care and nutrition as well as disease prevention. This hides the effect that our faster life style is inflicting on us. In other words, given the advances, we should be living even longer.
2006-11-05 15:35:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think medical advances have also contributed to us living longer. Also I believe in our minds we live too fast to fully appreciate our lives. Everyone seems to be in a hurry to become this or be there. Time exists only within our minds.
2006-11-05 15:30:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by BluLizard 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe statistics show us so. but the quality of living is more than stressed. live slowly and you will get old and die satisfied no matter when the death is coming. I can die satisfied in this minute. Because the life is endless it doesn't mater how long we live but what are we learning living. justOne
2006-11-05 16:07:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by justOne 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, and here I thought it was just better healthcare.
2006-11-05 15:28:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by spunk113 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
no..
i dont think so..
thanks for askin..
2006-11-05 15:29:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by akoaypilipino 4
·
0⤊
1⤋