chemistry: effects on volume of co2 with too little or too much of sodium bicarbonate/vinegar in a reaction..?

Question

~suppose you used the correct amount of sodium bicarbonate but an excess of vinegar. what effect would this have on the volume of carbon dioxide produced?

~suppose you used the correct amount of vinegar but less sodium bicarbonate than you needed. what effect would this have on the volume of carbon dioxide produced?

Answer 1

the CO2 comes from the sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO3. Too much vinegar shouldnt change the volume of CO2 released since the amount of NaHCO3 is the same. Changing the NaHCO3 would however change the amount of CO2 released. Less NaHCO3 would produce less CO2

Answer 2

This is a limiting reagant question. Whatever you have less of will be the limiting reagant it will control how far the reaction will go.

So you can have 1 mol of acetic acid and infinite amounts of sodium bicarbonate but you are only going to get 1 mol of CO2.

Answer 3

ok, you're asking a lot, yet i will attempt to respond to a number of this. it really is unlike a blanket. Blankets artwork because their insulation suppresses conduction and convection of warm temperature faraway from the body. The blanket analogy is a nasty one. further, the greenhouse analogy is likewise undesirable (even with the superiority of the terminology). You suggested the rock salt greenhouses. even with the meant results of absorption of lengthy wave IR by technique of typical glass, the rock salt greenhouses were given in basic terms as warmth. back, greenhouses suppress convection. They attempt this in a quite different trend than blankets, although. that is not about mirrored image, that is about absorption, thermalization and emission. CO2 does soak up some lengthy wave IR vacationing upwards that would want to otherwise go away the Earth equipment and go into area. It warms the CO2 molecules, which also radiate and collide with different air molecules. subsequently the temperature of air at that aspect will be quite hotter than it could be otherwise. As a blackbody (or gray body) it radiates thermally. i'm not particular why you're afflicted by technique of the floor of the Earth being hotter than it could be with a lot less CO2 (or different greenhouse gases). obviously this result's genuine--the Earth is drastically hotter than it could be without an ecosystem containing greenhouse gases. if you're wondering that it violates the 2d regulation of thermodynamics because there is downward radiation from the ambience, it really is in basic terms too simplistic, there is also upward radiation. that is not like the floor of the Earth is warming completely on the price of the ambience, there is more effective of the solar's capacity being retained contained in the Earth-ecosystem equipment, transferring the radiative equilibrium of the equipment to a larger temperature. CO2 is quite heavier than nitrogen and oxygen, yet not adequate for it to settle out. that is continually nicely-mixed contained in the decrease ecosystem, except in those unusual circumstances with little vertical blending and a wide source of CO2, like the tragedy that killed 1700 human beings at Lake Nyos in Cameroon in 1986.

Answer 4

If you pour 2000ml of water into a 250ml cup, you will have 250ml of water in the cup.