I would say a lesson. A lesson on "balance of power". When the former USSR was a superpower, it helped to hold in check the USA, which was the other major superpower. Once the USSR had fallen, the USA came up as the major power in the world. (other countries such as Great Britain, China, Japan, North Korea etc are not as strong-yet) As the USA is the major power they are able to exert more influence around the world. The lesson I would say there is that if there isnt any "balance" in the world power, then they are able to use that power in ways the rest of the world may not agree with but be powerless to stop; there isnt anything to really check their power.
2006-11-05 15:08:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cariad 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As became talked about, "the superpower" skill that India may be the in basic terms one, occupying the position that us of a has for the previous 20 years. i do not see that occurring. in spite of the indisputable fact that, I do see India increasing to massive capacity status contained in the subsequent couple of many years, in the adventure that they don't seem to be there already. a good capacity has wide global impact, economically, culturally, diplomatically, and militarily - they in basic terms don't have the almost endless attain of a superpower. India is truly on the brink of that - i think of their nonetheless extremely low GDP (pondering their inhabitants) and the extremely constrained strategic concentration they have save them as an important close by capacity, although. In 2030, the international's powers are in all likelihood going to be: us of a (nonetheless the international's most excellent capacity) China Japan Germany India France uk Russia
2016-11-28 20:00:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. No great nation ever became or remained great by apologizing for its power or intentionally restraining its influence. Great nations may ultimately have a largely positive (such as Great Britain) or largely negative (such as the USSR) legacy, but inevitably fail when they lose their certainty of greatness and the will to use that power.
2006-11-05 15:19:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by dukefenton 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, but the superpowered Neoconservative leaders don't care about morals. Have you read about their sexual misconduct lately? When they were killing hundreds of thousands of Arabs, and abusing the Patriotism of US soldiers, nobody seemed to care. Now that they're luring teens, beating mistresses and having sex with gay prostitutes, they are turning people's stomachs everywhere.
2006-11-05 14:55:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Reba K 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, remember Goliath. The larger they are the harder they fall. Rome, Egypt and the list goes on. Every superpower has it day and then it's over.
2006-11-05 14:53:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by kyle g 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is only one superpower left, which must be some kind of lesson.
2006-11-05 14:53:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure there is a lesson. It is about responibility and the costs involved. You might not get the pay back you thought or expected to get.
2006-11-05 14:54:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without a doubt.
2006-11-05 15:03:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Yes. YES !!! ONLY come with a clear plan and purpose and only come when clearly I N V I T E D ! ! ! !
2006-11-05 14:55:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by OlCripsWife 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, small nations....dont phuck with big ones, you will be turned to into glass if you do
2006-11-05 14:52:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by flyin_gsxr600 4
·
0⤊
1⤋