how does the queen and prince philp fell about thier new daughter-in-law carmilla duchess of york
2006-11-05 13:54:13 · 11 answers · asked by DARNELLA A 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
At first they felt she was "unworthy" and when they found out she "wasn't going away" they took a wait-and-see attitude. When she "turned herself around" became a "quiet person of respect and didn't speak out of turn or make unkind comments about the Royals" she was considered to be "okay." Not good, not great, just "okay."
What can you do when your child is in love with someone you do not prefer for them? Accept it and go on. So, they do the reasonable thing, they "accept the fact that Charles is married to a divorcee" and live with it. They do not like it at all, but they don't have to do they. Its up to Charles, not them. In public they simply put on their "public faces" and do their jobs.
Camilla does not make waves, so they appreciate her for that. You take what you can get.
2006-11-05 14:19:49 · answer #1 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Camilla Parker Bowles Windsor is not the Duchess of York, she is the Duchess of Cornwall. Sarah Ferguson is the Duchess of York. The Duchess of Cornwall can only hope for minimum resistance, never total acceptance.
2006-11-05 16:11:39 · answer #2 · answered by martha d 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the Queen has a middling opinion of her. Compared to Diana, Camilla doesn't do controversial things (such as working with AIDS patients or land mine victims). Her only real 'black mark' is that she is a divorcee. So, the Queen probably likes this about her.
I also think the Queen may be happy with the fact that Camilla's popularity doesn't overshadow her own (which wasn't the case with Diana).
2006-11-07 01:27:27 · answer #3 · answered by curiogirl84 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that as a mother, the Queen knows in her heart that Charles is with the only woman he ever truly loved. She may not approve of the way they've conducted themselves all these years, but I would be happy if my son was.
2006-11-07 03:04:53 · answer #4 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. But it depends upon how different humans view it. Though it is not legitimate to our society and oftentimes referred to as it incest. Actually I have a cousin (male) being married (civil & via pass judgement on) to his cousin (father facet second cousin). Both events endure the identical surname. But earlier than the pass judgement on accredited the wedding vows, it took them (pass judgement on) nine months to hint and learned that they're each far away relative and used to be given the privilege to be legally married. They have already got a little one and s/he's average bodily. Some beginning defects on little one exhibit up now not handiest bodily but it surely additionally impacts the little one mentality and adding inner because of incompatible blood relation. It manner, both the little one susceptible to melanoma comparable sicknesses, intellectual ailment or worse as they develop historical.
2016-09-01 07:51:50 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that they are not quite fond of her. The queen did not want Charles to marry Camilla.
2006-11-06 07:19:57 · answer #6 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I also guess that she is not fond of her. I don't know much about it. Hopefully overtime she'll get over it, and see her as a nice person. As long as they are happy that is what should matter. Mother's will be mothers.
2006-11-06 10:59:27 · answer #7 · answered by TBT 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Queen has no feelings for any one.
2006-11-08 14:29:10 · answer #8 · answered by George K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've actually heard she's not really happy with her and feels she is a traitor or betrayed by her.
2006-11-05 15:05:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
excuse mois? DUH! HRM will get pissed real bad! Who would like a gold digger for a daughter-in-law. EEW! Camilla Parker Bowles, she doesn't deserve a title, she's a freakin' husband-thief and gold digger.
2006-11-07 12:13:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋