Do it by ballot not bullet, unless within the guidelines of our own Declaration of Independence.
2006-11-05 13:30:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eldude 6
·
8⤊
0⤋
Are you in favor of causing the death of 20% of the population or more, and then being left with no stable form of self-rule but having to impose order? You might want to take the example learned from Jefferson Davis' mad excursion into secession and revolt to heart, keeping in mind he was only facing down cavalry and cannons.
2006-11-05 13:34:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tomteboda 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
1/2 of the US population does not even vote and have no concern.
So that is 50 percent of the populaton.
Given that at this time 35 percent of the total populaton support Bush.
So 1/2 don't care about who runs things, 35 like what is happening, so basicly there is only a small majority of people that would want to do something availalbe to do it
2006-11-05 13:33:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Do it as soon as posible because one day American people will wake up that all Muslim countries are already aiming at them including North Korea , Iran , & Syria due to their president who is bringing them into the wrong directions.
2006-11-06 11:20:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What would that accomplish..You would want to have a democratic society so you would have to have elections..Elections cost money and the rich industrialists and the same family monies of big business wuld be right back in there...Do not even suggest revolt on yahoo unless you would like to be put to death for TREASON
2006-11-05 13:32:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by ray b 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Why would we? What would we do afterwards,and what kind of government would we have? Answer those questions and i might give you a response, which would be a really big NO! My guess is your an Anarchist or a Communist, or just a disgruntled misinformed liberal.
2006-11-05 13:31:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by asmith1022_2006 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
You have no hope using force. But I could see an economic and political upheavel is people could spread enough awareness about the tyranny under which they live, but don't know anything different.
2006-11-05 13:39:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jared H 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some people have stated that I asked some stupid questions,,,so since I am the appointed authority on stupid questions, I pass the mantle to you. Your question beats any I have heard!!!
2006-11-05 13:38:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by D.A. S 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
And replace it with what? An anarchy? Oligharchy? Monarchy? Dictatorship? A DEMOCRACY? (And no, the U.S. is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. It is a Republic).
In short... No...
2006-11-05 13:33:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Firestorm 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
If you're so wishy-washy about it that you would ask that question here, I would say it would be ill-advised. By asking the question here, it sounds like you aren't yet willing to die for the idea, and revolutions are started and won by people who are willing to die, not by people.... like you.
2006-11-05 13:33:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by open4one 7
·
4⤊
0⤋