English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do you feel that there will be attacks against the US on US soil because of Iraqi justice? And if so .. sooner than later?

"The hanging of Saddam Hussein will turn to hell for the Americans," said Vitaya Wisethrat, a respected Muslim cleric in Thailand, which has its own Islamic insurgency in the country's south.

"The Saddam case is not a Muslim problem but the problem of America and its domestic politics," he said. "Maybe Bush will use this case to tell the voters that Saddam is dead and that the Americans are safe. But actually the American people will be in more danger with the death of Saddam."

2006-11-05 13:08:22 · 11 answers · asked by Active Denial System™ 6 in Politics & Government Politics

OkieBoy - It was real & sincere question. Obviously you are the nutcase. Good luck with that.

2006-11-05 13:20:37 · update #1

~family matters~☺ - Carter was close to 30 years ago. Let's talk about the now. And if you need to we can talk about who put Saddam in power. All of these extremist organizations are partly due to US meddling.

2006-11-05 13:28:35 · update #2

11 answers

Many citizens of Iraq supported Saddam. He was put into his role in Iraq by the hands of American politicians during the Reagan era. The Iraqi people know that. They may have had it hard before this conflict started, but basically, they have lost their world as they know it. They could at least live and go about their business if they accepted the rules of Saddam's regime. Now they have lost anything they ever had.

Yes, I think it will have a terrible, adverse effect on America and it is a serious matter we should all be worried about. We are not liberators in Iraqi's eyes.

2006-11-05 13:13:58 · answer #1 · answered by nobluffzone 5 · 1 2

It does not matter one way or the other. Remember 911, that was well before Saddam. They do not need another excuse.
They hate us all. No matter what color, what gender or what age we are. If I were in power as Mr. Bush is, I would vote to nuc them all. It is the only way to keep us safe from them. (Not really but I sure would be tempted.)

You can thank Jimmy Carter for Iran. He brought the Ayatollah back by dumping the Shaw Of Iran. And the Ayatollah said thanks by taking over 400 Americans hostages.

It will get worse after Saddam is hanged, but do you really believe that if he got life that another one of the Nutty Muslim groups would not kill because of that? They hate us. It does not matter what we do.

2006-11-05 13:23:35 · answer #2 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 1 2

But, that is what the war is about. If America had no enemies in a post-Cold War world there would be no point in spending over 600 billion a year on defense. The war isn't about making us safer, its about oil and ensuring a new generations of enemies to put through the Military Industrial meat grinder.

2006-11-05 13:15:27 · answer #3 · answered by Jared H 3 · 2 2

NAH! THE DEATH SENTENCE IS GOOD FOR THE IRAQI PEOPLE. THERE WERE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IN THE STREETS! YOU WILL SEE ALOT LESS ATTACKS FROM THE INSURGENTS ONCE THE ELECTIONS ARE OVER! THE CIVIL WAR BETWEEN THE SHIITES AND SUNI'S IS COMING TO A HEAD! THE IRAQI'S AREN'T OUT TO KILL AMERICANS,THE INSURGENTS ARE! THEY HOLD THE TERRORISTS AND THEY ARE THE ONES WE WORRY ABOUT! NOT THE IRAQI PEOPLE!

2006-11-05 13:13:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you won't be able to, a minimum of not by technique of militarily might want to on my own. i'm not a pacifist, yet you won't be able to win a warfare on what a human being comes to a decision to do at any any given second in time. The time period "warfare on Terror" is in basic terms straight forward stupid. i comprehend a thanks to have a warfare on a rustic, yet how are you going to have a warfare on an action? The "warfare on drugs" is yet another stupid time period. The "warfare on XYZ" is only a slogan it really is undemanding to promote to simpletons who've no severe wondering skills. that is in basic terms an excuse for GW to get the large funds $ he needs to save our defense force and private contractors over there. by technique of how, I artwork with a lady who has a son there as a contractor that works alongside the squaddies networking pcs. She suggested he makes over 150K for doing the exact same component because the squaddies who make about 25K. a lot for that LIE that particular human beings make about the own sector continually being so a lot more effective effectual and maximum cost-efficient than the authorities. yet, I digress. yet, there's a thanks to get the better hand in this. yet, it really is in basic terms not politically nicely perfect. and that is by technique of infiltarating the mosques with spies and insect the crap out of all the places the position the inciters collect. locate out who they are and then 86 'em. also, make it so the relations of the guy who blew themselves up has to reimburse the victims. And in the adventure that they could't, they loose each and every thing. Their abode, automobiles, $, their toddlers are taken away to be "re-knowledgeable". also, they want to take the remains of the bomber or terrorist and position them contained in the sewer equipment, so as that they could't get a "suitable" burial. finally, they want to make it a lack of existence sentance crime to promote or glorify the terrorists interior the rustic of Iraq. do not you in basic terms love the crap that GW placed us in. What a moron. I particular desire the Republican party can provide us a more effective perfect candidate next time. I keep in mind Hanity saying how undesirable it could be to get Kerry. nicely, i do not see how he would have achieved any worse. Infact, I in all likelihood would vote for him if I knew what I do now. All that $ spent would have bailed out social protection in all likelihood many situations over.

2016-11-28 19:55:18 · answer #5 · answered by papen 4 · 0 0

Your a nutcase!

And to tellitlike..... You have no friggin idea what a country divided is. I was around and kicking during the vietname war, THAT was a country divided, we are absolutely nowhere near that point and would take a decade to get there! War here, bonehead!

You people that want to cower in fear with your head in the sand and pretend the world is a wonderful place make me want to puke! We fight them there, not on our streets, that seems to be an extremely hard concept for you to understand!

2006-11-05 13:17:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Yes , we probably will be in more danger because those whom liked him will be angered and he will be a martyr and will make them wish for the us 's destruction , most likely though , they will go after the soldiers already stationed there , November will be the worst month for us .

2006-11-05 13:22:03 · answer #7 · answered by kame 2 · 2 1

i'm afraid that you may be right but i sure hope that you're not for our sake. it only stands to reason that the arabs are going to makeus pay for killing saddam one way or another.

2006-11-05 13:17:17 · answer #8 · answered by roy40372 6 · 2 1

There will be War on American soil, if our Troops are brought home too soon...

2006-11-05 13:10:14 · answer #9 · answered by Bob 2 · 2 2

Considering that Sunnis are pissed off by the verdict, and Al-Qaeda are Sunnis, it could get much, much worse...

2006-11-05 13:10:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers