Which one seems more articulate, goal-directed and intelligent to you?

Question

http://www.scottkleeb.com/issues/index.php

http://www.joinadrian.com/issue.htm

Answer 1

Kleeb's argument makes more sense by structure as well as by appealing to the Nebraskan citizenry. Smith though has a well centered argument which can bring about strong change with long term benefits for the state.

When it comes to choosing in a case like this, you should look at each candidate's personal background. Decide not only upon credibility and integrity, but capability and networking as well. A candidate can be motivated and loyal all he wants, but if he doesn't have the ability to get the job done, it won't matter how hard he tries, he still won't be successful.

Answer 2

Adrian has an immigration stand that is logical Kleeb doesn't even mention it as an issue. Adrian has better sense.

Answer 3

http://www.kinkyfriedman.com/