He has indirectly killed so many innocent Iraqis and the world court just keeping quiet. If Saddam who was convicted for the murder of 149 Shiites was sentenced to hang, why not Bush who is as atrocious as Saddam?
2006-11-05 13:00:09 · 29 answers · asked by pgmetassan 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We can only hope that some day Bush will be held to account for his crimes against humanity.
2006-11-05 13:02:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Saddam=killed 149 in Iraq
BUSH=killed 472 in Iraq+ killed 234 in Afghanistan+killed 22 in Yemen
Man if he goes to the court he is really a dead man
2006-11-06 21:19:40 · answer #2 · answered by bambozi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
9/11 provided bush a golden possibility to enhance up his very low pollnumbers, to make particularly some money for his gangster pals, and to motivate human beings to throw their liberties away. Saddam replaced into incidental to all this.
2016-10-21 08:09:59 · answer #3 · answered by titman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen you idiot the difference between the two is that President Bush did not give the orders to murder innocent people. Think about who is really doing the killing. Al-Qaida and numerous others. Instead of talking crap about a man who is trying to make the world a safer place worry about Al-Qaida. You lucky we don't put people on trial for ignorance here in the US because you would be right next to Saddam.
2006-11-05 13:12:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Shut the hell up, peope die in war, GET OVER IT!!!! Everyone hates war, but it is always going to be around, Saddam deliberatly murdered those who he was served to hang for, not to mention the genocide of the Kurds, and if you think that Bush is anywhere near as atrocious as Saddam, please get a life, or at least pick up a book study totalitarianism. When does the accidental death of civilians count as attrocities?
2006-11-05 13:05:52 · answer #5 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋
"Bush is sending American men and women overseas everyday for you, so they can fight for our freedom. Without his lead, you would not be able to ask a question like this." WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP! Our freedom isn't based in a foreign country. Do you actually believe that while you take long drives in your SUV? (rolling eyes)
No Bush should not be tried like Saddam. However he should be impeached along with Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of the gang.
2006-11-05 13:14:19 · answer #6 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Bush is sending American men and women overseas everyday for you, so they can fight for our freedom. Without his lead, you would not be able to ask a question like this. Bush is doing what needs to be done. Have some respect for him and the position he is in!
2006-11-05 13:07:14 · answer #7 · answered by Stephanie 1 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Give me a break. You must be bored because even a dumba** knows the atrocities of Bush are no where near those of Saddam.
2006-11-05 13:02:48 · answer #8 · answered by Chris 4 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Of course. He is a war criminal.
2006-11-07 04:39:51 · answer #9 · answered by Dieguito Maradona 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should be worried about that. He is responsible for hundreds of thousands deaths of Iraqi citizens and 3,000 American Soldiers.
2006-11-05 13:04:05 · answer #10 · answered by nobluffzone 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋