2006-11-05 12:53:05 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Well, for one, reproduction would be no fun: no sex.
For another, biodiversity would be almost nonexistent because when cells reproduce asexually they produce carbon copies of themselves. So if I were to asexually reproduce I would end up with a child whose only difference from me would be its age. It might even be the same size as me, since the result of mitosis is two identically sized cells.
2006-11-05 12:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by anon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i became questioning approximately this a week or 2 in the past. i became questioning approximately how interior the destiny as quickly as we are finding out on the genes of childrens until now they're born (like interior the action picture Gattaca) then we are able to start to tinker with humanity and reproduction and that i will guess that ultimately we are able to decide for to make humanity one gender and reason ourselves to have the flexibility to reproduce asexually. and such as you reported, there will be MANY advantages of the form of society. i think of one gender that reproduces asexually is the way forward for humanity. maximum suitable needs :)
2016-12-10 03:18:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, for one, there would be about 60 billion of us, rather than 6 billion.
2006-11-05 12:57:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Almost clones, I like it. Mini me. Very shagadelic.
2006-11-05 12:57:39 · answer #4 · answered by Labsci 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very boring indeed !!
2006-11-05 13:00:17 · answer #5 · answered by Bill P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bo....ring!
2006-11-05 13:00:21 · answer #6 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋