with the idea that evil begets evil. also do we really know whats going on with the spin that the u.s. press is forced to put on the story. also think about the idea that bush killed 2,700 soilders for no reson. and that he is on trail becouse we entered his country to find weopans of mass desturcion but didn't find any. is he now just a scape goat for bush and the war on terror
2006-11-05 12:16:18 · 12 answers · asked by marathoncook 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Your spelling leaves a lot to be desired, but I get the drift of what you are saying and yes I agree that Bush should also be put to trial because he too has not only killed his own soldiers but innocent people to in Iraq. If one rule is good for one person, its good for another.
My husband is a US citizen and now lives in the UK. He has just told me that if a soldier is shipped home injured and dies on the flight home or dies back home in the US, those figures are not included in the deaths in Iraq. So the true figure of soldiers being killed as a result of the war in Iraq stands more like 13,000 to date.
2006-11-05 12:19:34 · answer #1 · answered by lollipoppett2005 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The definition of "evil" varies by person. Saddam's evil and the one made in the decision to put him to death are different. Saddam oppressed and killed thousands of his own people. One man is getting killed for killing said people. Two different things. And on the subject of the soldiers that died, they VOLUNTEERED for the military, it's not like they were drafted. Whenever a person makes the decision to join there is always the chance that they will die, especially in times of war.
2006-11-05 20:34:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hussein should be hanged, because he killed lots of people. He's not a scapegoat for Bush. President Bush was misinformed and thought wrong which cost us lives and time over there, a huge mistake that he can't take back. As for the war of terror, he's the one he caused it, if there's a link or was a link to Obama bin Laden.
2006-11-05 20:19:00 · answer #3 · answered by Kristen H 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think they should it is a big step for iraq and it will give most of the people hope
on the other hand, there will be many more riots and violence will increase indefinately. In one way, i think that maybe it is a bad thing to give him the death sentence
2006-11-05 20:20:08 · answer #4 · answered by tennistarforever 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
And Bush should be put on trial for it. For all the soldiers he sent to Iraq that were killed.
2006-11-05 20:40:45 · answer #5 · answered by Haley 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, he was tried in his own country, in their court system with their judges. If they found him guilty, it is their findings, not ours, if their system calls for his execution, it is again their law. In our county, he would not be executed for at least ten years while going through the appeals process. In his country, unless the judges disagree on the verdict, he must be executed within 30 days. So, who are we to contradict the laws of his own nation?
2006-11-05 20:19:25 · answer #6 · answered by brucenjacobs 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No two wrongs don't make a right, no matter how bad is the first wrong
2006-11-07 14:17:51 · answer #7 · answered by gladys_lassonde 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes they should.
i have a close friend related to saddam and he himself says he deserves to die.
He has killed thousands and thousands of people and sometimes 10,000 of his own men in a single day!
Some were relatives.
YES HE SHOULD DIE SLOW AND PAINFULLY
2006-11-05 20:18:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, he deserves the death penalty. It will put him out of our misery.
2006-11-05 20:18:06 · answer #9 · answered by timcurrysfan 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no two wrongs don't make a right...one has the right to kill anyone
2006-11-05 20:24:52 · answer #10 · answered by t_roy_e 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋