Tonight, in Topeka Kansas, in reference to the War on Terror the President said, "Harsh criticism is not a plan for victory, and second guessing is not a strategy!"
Does he accurately describe the majority of Democrats? If yes, why, if no, why?
2006-11-05 12:04:06 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Democrats from the beginning have had problems with terrorism. For one thing they haven't produce a plan on terrorism. By the way there have been some rank and file Dems which have broken away from their party and have gone Republican. Why? the ranting far left and thier criticism of the President. The keep talking the talk but they haven't produce results. U see Democrats care about is power and high taxes.
2006-11-05 12:17:59 · answer #1 · answered by chuck h 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
1) "Harsh criticism in not a plan for victory" :
Intellectual, insightful criticism is a PLAN to enlighten people to vote for a change FOR victory. We are educating the country that is blindsighted by the REPUB news media that there is another side and we need to get rid of the senators who only rubber stamp this warmongering president's view on every issue. Then we can address this war with a better plan for victory and try to redeem ourselves for even defiling our country with this terrible invasive action that was not warranted.
2) "Second guessing is not a strategy".:
He should know because he is second, third and 4th guessing and no telling how much more he will guess. He has been wrong in every aspect of this war; especially since he is protecting Bin Laden by not venturing to capture him.
3) Accurately describe the Democrats?:
Of course not. He would discredit a repub too if they did not agree with him because he has already. He is deluded thinking he is right about everything he does when actuality, he is insane.
Why is because he has set himself up to be a judge and dictator of the world.
2006-11-05 12:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by nobluffzone 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He had to be talking about Democrats, of course. Well they are critical, but the second guessing?? Perhaps Democrats are like everybody else only guessing what Bushs' strategy is. There was a segment on the news Democrats are working on a platform, will have to wait see what Democrats "are for".
2006-11-05 12:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by longroad 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
probably. i'm a registered independent. i lean democrat and i'm definitely politically and socially liberal. however, you'd have to be crazy not to wonder about democrats sometimes! i mean, seriously. some of the well-known democrats just drive me crazy sometimes. i could never, ever register as a democrat.
yeah, i think he's mostly right. a lot of democratic leaders just argue that we should never have gone to war or sometimes they briefly mention ideas that might lead to a solution in iraq. what we really need is a concrete plan. sure, america should always be strong, but we've gotta be smart too.
personally, i don't think bush has a plan or has ever had a plan or probably ever will have a plan. partitioning is a decent idea, but it's gonna take a LOT of brainstormiing to get us out of this one. not just partisan talk.
2006-11-05 12:15:55 · answer #4 · answered by starfishblues 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats say we should leave Iraq and deal with the situations in N Korea and Iran. Seems like a plan and strategy. The harsh critiicism is due to bush doing nothing. He is upset because it is true.
2006-11-05 12:15:04 · answer #5 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
completely wrong.
if u are in the middle of a mistake, do you try to fix the mistake or continue to make the same mistake?
the only way to fix a mistake that is underway is to question what is going on.
[constructive] harsh criticism and second guessing is a way to try and realize mistakes that were made in the past and then fix them.
30% of people still believe sadam hussein had weapons of mass destruction... if it wasnt for the democrats that number would 100%, and we would be preparing for an endless war in Iraq, and preparing for wars with Iran and whoever else does not agree with american policy.
balance is always necessary
2006-11-05 12:14:20 · answer #6 · answered by da_d0dgers 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The war in Iraq has no concerning our liberties. while we went into Iraq it had no bearing on the known "war on terror". It does now because of the way the war has been mismanaged. i can't help his judgements if i've got self belief that they are detrimental to this u . s .. it is not in basic terms my good as American to communicate out, its my accountability as a citizen. As for the handle this night, it relatively is organic politics. this is all of the State of the Union message ever is. this is why i do no longer take it too heavily. i % to work out strikes, no longer basically hear rhetoric.
2016-11-27 21:02:31 · answer #7 · answered by muhammad 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has no plan, had no plan, and hasn't stated any future plan for 'fixing' Iraq.
His rhetoric is his only consistent act: to continually divert attention away from everything he has totally f**ked up.
Not to mention that he has changed the reason for invading Iraq every other day.
2006-11-05 12:24:48 · answer #8 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't think so , since , after all , we seem to have retaliated to the wrong country , shouldn't he not have guessed that attacking anywhere would pay off , and this could be counted as harsh criticism .
2006-11-05 12:09:54 · answer #9 · answered by kame 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Democrats would feel differently if he would state what his strategy is. Bush's strategy was that we invade and the people greet us as liberators.
It didn't happen.
2006-11-05 12:07:40 · answer #10 · answered by Your Best Fiend 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋