English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-05 11:49:10 · 14 answers · asked by R Purushotham Rao 4 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

How do you not support it? He committed genocide and killed thousands of people in his own country and then just dumped them in mass graves like animals. He was attempting to "cleanse" his country to his liking, much like Hitler. He isn't the only one - how about that upstanding leader in Darfur? There's a real dilly for you... I'm not much for capital punishment since DNA testing has set free more than a couple people on death row who were proved innocent. But in a case like Saddam? Who needs DNA, the whole world knows who was running that show. I say hang him on public TV.

2006-11-05 11:54:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Kimon, you're "ineffective" incorrect and that i'll enable you to comprehend why. The punishment would desire to extra wholesome the crime. If i'm killed via a decrease than the effect of alcohol driving force as against being killed via a economic organisation robber, the justice equipment identifies the distinction. no one is going to get the dying penalty for involuntarily killing somebody else. yet you could wager your Texas ranch that some states right here gets you stable for voluntary acts of homicide. Now you seem saying it somewhat is ironic to kill somebody for killing, and then hiding in the back of "justice" because of the fact the reason. perchance on some distant point, it would seem ironic and immoral. fortuitously for you, in spite of the undeniable fact that, that's no longer the case. If I walk as much as you and placed a bullet on your head, then the state of Texas ends my existence with deadly injection, the two at the instant are not morally equivalent. One is punishment for committing the main heinous crime undemanding to guy. the different is the determination to dedicate such an act. basically one is warped in nature.

2016-10-21 08:03:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't support capital punishment even in cases like Saddam's where the culprit deserves it. The high officials of Us and Israeli regimes are as no less criminals than Saddam.

2006-11-05 12:02:34 · answer #3 · answered by peace m 5 · 0 0

I don't support the Death Penalty in any case. Besides, life in prison is a worse punishment.

2006-11-05 11:55:34 · answer #4 · answered by MateoFalcone 4 · 1 0

no, I don't agree with the death penalty at all, although I do believe anyone accused of such crimes should be tried and punished if found guilty. There many others to add to the list hun...

2006-11-05 11:53:50 · answer #5 · answered by me 6 · 1 0

>Hand raised< That's how. He is a murderer and capital punishment is his reward in the eyes of man and justice to survivors of his victims.

2006-11-05 11:51:10 · answer #6 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 1 0

I don't support capital punishment at all. Saddam is no different.

2006-11-05 11:51:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I was hoping they'd bring him back here to imprison him, so I could help pay for all his care. I think that would be a good investment.

2006-11-05 11:55:41 · answer #8 · answered by Chris 4 · 0 0

I don't

For his big ego, the worst punishment is to keephim locked up, reminding him of the powers he lost.

Killing him will make him a martir forever

2006-11-05 11:52:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No. By killing him they are lowering to his level.

It would be better to toss him in jail for the rest of his life to rot.

2006-11-05 12:03:50 · answer #10 · answered by Jack Walsh 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers