George W Bush is responsible for far more deaths then Saddam Hussein
2006-11-05 10:59:31 · 14 answers · asked by Bo V 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
i see where you are going and probably there is no way to change your opinion but hussein litterally killed his people without going to war but bush not litterally killed his people in war. this is like saying any war leader like truman or johnson or rosevelt or any other country leader in war should be killed because they killed their people in war. i understand you won't agree with me but at least if you respect my opinion that would be awesome.
2006-11-05 11:06:33 · answer #1 · answered by GS 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
A pat on the back and a job well done. That's what he would get from the majority of the people in Iraq. Unfortunately Saddam's sadistic policies live on within the Radical side of the Muslim religious leaders. The situation in Iraq is much more complicated than can be put on a sound bite. The war on Terror would be happening now no matter who was in office. The difference is it's on their ground not ours. This is from the proud mother of a U.S. Soldier currently serving in Iraq.
2006-11-05 11:28:48 · answer #2 · answered by j.m.glass 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
many people on indexed under are saying that Saddam did no longer kill 1000's of people. that's incorrect he had 1000's of yank troops killed by potential of his order interior the conflict in Iraq. So sure Saddam grew to become into killed and bush merits credit for it. merely like obama with usama.
2016-12-28 13:54:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush deserves all of us rising up against this regime we are living under called the United States of America...i want my rights back...the sooner the better...go away Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld....they are all fools
2006-11-05 14:05:12 · answer #4 · answered by Cassie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same. At least life in jail, if not.
They both killed many innocent American lives.
Bush by war, Saddam by terrorisim.
2006-11-05 12:43:45 · answer #5 · answered by Haley 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Given his Illuminati and Masonic connections, his obvious involvement in 9/11 and how he has duped most in the USA I think he should definitely give you some straight answers.
But I truly think he is incapable of that so a firing squad might be required.
Have you noticed it's only the side who loses who gets charged with war crimes? Innocents die on all sides of a war, but the ones with the biggest guns win and get to punish their foes all over again.
2006-11-05 11:16:33 · answer #6 · answered by Curious1 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Do your research on the terrors that Saddam has done to people before even beginning to compare him to ANYBODY, let alone Bush.
2006-11-05 11:07:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
They should hang side by side. Just because you call it a war doesn't make it one, just a place to send men to die.
2006-11-05 11:22:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He should be tried for crimes against humanity for what he's done to Iraq.
2006-11-05 11:10:18 · answer #9 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
A visit to Iraq and let their people decide his fate.
2006-11-05 11:07:22 · answer #10 · answered by Rex 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋