English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That it was HIS fault Osama was successful the second time around, in the bombing of the WTC????

2006-11-05 10:40:46 · 23 answers · asked by Bob 2 in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

Your assuming he has a conscience. I don't think he does.

2006-11-05 10:42:09 · answer #1 · answered by roxy 5 · 6 7

the two events are in basic terms as corrupt because of the fact the different The national debt is the two events fault. u . s . development expenses ALOT of funds Over 12 Trillon and transforming into on a daily basis because of the fact that 1972 The Gramm Leach bill led to our present day disaster and replaced right into a BI PARTISAN bill signed by skill of Clinton. Republicans and Democrats are in basic terms mendacity criminals If the Libertarian social gathering were allowed we'd nonetheless have problems to unravel yet our debt by skill of may well be plenty decrease and economic equipment in extra desirable shape than something of the international. yet that interior the previous Now usa and its shape are toast

2016-11-27 20:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is a Rush/Neocon simple minded lie. Why lie? Bush ignored the PDB. Bush was warned. One thing for sure Clinton has become very wealthy because of the Neocons hate. He now gets $250,000 per speech and I'm sure as a million air he sleeps very well.
Only a Idiot like Rush would blame Clinton for Bush's lack of action before Sept. 11th. Bush was told they would use hijacked planes, Bush was told they were already in this Country, Bush did nothing.

2006-11-05 10:52:16 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 2 1

I guess that LIE helps YOU fall asleep. Again it kills me that republicans like you cannot accept the fact that BOTH CLINTON AND BUSH have the responsibility, and that republicans like you have this idea that bush is blameless FOR EVERYTHING.

What happened after 9/11? Was Osama caught? Was he prosecuted? Was he executed for his horrific crime? NO. bush thought it was better to let him go and go into Iraq. Meanwhile, Osama may or may not be alive, and we definitely know HE WAS NOT CAUGHT.

You tell me, do you think george bush, jr has a hard time sleeping at night, knowing....?

2006-11-05 10:52:44 · answer #4 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 2 1

I don't believe that you are getting the full scope , it isn't his fault , Osama bin laden had already been mixed into American politics , whom was he friends with in the beginning , you should try to learn more about the full case then just one part , as well if this is how you plan on thinking , how does bush get sleep .

oh and if you didn't know it was bush .

2006-11-05 10:59:14 · answer #5 · answered by kame 2 · 2 1

I think he has a hard time sleeping because he is campaigning away from his wife and is having a lot of fun. I don't really think he cares about Osama and never did.

2006-11-05 10:46:32 · answer #6 · answered by greeiore 3 · 3 1

Nope. Because 9/11 didn't happen while on his watch as president. He was a great president, while he wasn't getting bj's and stuff......
The whole 9/11 thing shares plenty of blame, but it's useless to play blame games now. The blame game isn't going to bring back the 2,973 Americans who died on that tragic day.

2006-11-05 11:01:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Listen to the Bush Administration. Forget about the Intelligence surveillance and bombings of Afghanistan that Clinton did. Be ignorant. See if i care.

2006-11-05 10:44:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

George Bush hasn't been able to catch him either. Even with troops and a war in Iraq

2006-11-05 10:55:10 · answer #9 · answered by Dot 2 · 1 1

Uh, you're WRONG ! It was the repub controlled congress that prevented Clinton from doing anything. Blame BushCo...

2006-11-05 10:53:56 · answer #10 · answered by Kaori 5 · 2 1

It wasn't his fault. You have to go back decades to understand the full history behind Osama bin Laden, his beliefs, his organization, etc.

You're radically oversimplifying a complex story. You have to go back to the late 70's and early 80's and understand the Soviet Invasion and subsequent events.

2006-11-05 10:45:08 · answer #11 · answered by misskate12001 6 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers