English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The War in Iraq is as un-popular today as the Vietnam War was at its height--- Yet there are no mass demonstrations on American streets......Can an Anti-War Movement Confined Largely to the Internet and Voting Booth Change the Course of a WAR?

Great question posed in the IDEAS section of my local Newsaper. What do you think?

2006-11-05 09:42:47 · 5 answers · asked by big-brother 3 in Politics & Government Politics

very well said "holly" thanks.

2006-11-05 09:49:35 · update #1

very hard to disagree with you "Lawrence Louis" You have a lot of knowlege to impart to the rest of us. I appreciate it, thanks.

2006-11-05 09:52:02 · update #2

5 answers

The Internet has been shown to be a catalyst for change in politics. That is why, as of recent, many talk show pundits have paid particular attention to bloggers. So in short the Internet, and our decisions at the voting booth, can work to expedite our withdrawal from this futile war, assuming that our efforts are not directed at electing just Republican or Democrats, who have recently become mere caricatures of each other. If we use the potent venue of the Internet and our electoral power to bring enough Independents to power, we can sway this country away from this costly and unjust war.

2006-11-05 09:49:21 · answer #1 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 4 0

I ought to assert that the main properly known reason McCain lost replaced into the financial equipment, no longer the war. As for the lack of ability of anti-war communicate anymore it relatively is because of the fact there's a sparkling plan to go away Iraq by skill of 2011 and additionally Iraqis are approximately to vote on an addition to their next pollto which they're going to vote regardless of if or to no longer permit American troops go away early. an identical theory replaced into blocked by skill of President Bush and saved us in Iraq 2 years longer. near to Afghanistan I ought to assert that i for my area do no longer help very practically any war distant places. I do think of that Afghanistan is the extra mandatory war nonetheless.

2016-11-27 20:47:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well many people like myself are unwilling to spend days traveling to washington or to organize a local protest because the truth would be twisted by the media .
Cindy Shehan or something spelled like that is running around and getting hammered for her efforts and she had a son killed .

2006-11-05 09:48:58 · answer #3 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 3 0

Unfortunately no, I don't think it's enough. There's something much more persuasive and powerful about public demonstrations; it's kind of the difference between reading a story and then seeing it on film -it changes the whole impact.

2006-11-05 09:46:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

an anti-war movement by itself will have no effect unless there is a larger awakening to the fact that there is ALOT of corruption on capitol hill .. these things and the people behind them need to be exposed ... thats my opinion on the matter of antiwar ... by itself it misses the boat ... and being strictly anti-war while at the same time saying you support the war on terror is actually playing into their hands ... the whole smorg is bs ..

2006-11-05 09:48:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers