Saddam has been sentenced to be hung to death for killing people that did not live by the laws of his country. Since Mr. Bush has executed American citizens for the same crimes, shouldn't he be tried and hung too?
2006-11-05 08:40:05 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I have a feeling your going to get a lot of yes'...I actually had the same thought when I heard the verdict on Saddam...
2006-11-05 08:47:39 · answer #1 · answered by Just Dreamin' 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I really don't know how to put it into words but I believe when he sent our guys over there, he placed their lives in jeopardy, and the innocent people of Iraq (women and children), because they died also. I guess I am having a hard time saying what I am about to say. No, I don't believe Bush should be hung. What Saddam did is different than what Bush did. Saddam raped and killed innocent women, he made them whores and killed them off so they wouldn't tell, he stole money from people totaling into the millions....etc you get the picture. Bush did not do anything like that; although I think we ought to get our military service men out of there. NOW TOO!! The Iraq's are gonna be upset when they find out that Saddam is going to hang. Its a very intense and serious situation and we don't need to have any U.S. people over there!! I do believe that Bush has not been the very best president by no means..I think he's made a lot of wrong turns and mistakes while in office. I will be glad when gets out . He has almost broke the U.S. money-wise. I would not want another 4 years of Bush in there.
2006-11-05 09:50:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hung, no. However, there are too many errors he's done in office to be listed all at one time. He never should've been president in the first place. Kerry, I'm not so sure, but Gore would've definitely been better than Bush. I think the American people can see that quite easily.
2006-11-05 08:49:55 · answer #3 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. But, to draw a more appropriate analogy, Hussein ordered the killing of several hundred innocent iraqi people. Bush has ordered the killing of several thousand innocent Iraqi people. So, Bush should be hung a hundred times over.
2006-11-05 08:44:37 · answer #4 · answered by tornado 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why do people asked dumb questions like this, Bush has not killed people, Saddam is a cold blooded killer even of his own people try to grow up and then come back a asked a real question.
2006-11-05 08:50:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some long dead Roman guy said, "to the victor belong the spoils". Saddam lost George didn't. Get an education and someday you too can puzzle out these tough questions for yourself.
2006-11-05 08:50:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes he should. Bush was just a little bit (and I hate to use this word in the same sentence as his name..) smarter by hiding behind 911 and other lies. How much more blood has to be shed for oil anyway?
2006-11-05 08:45:18 · answer #7 · answered by girl_interupted83 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
those enormous economic establishments have been turning out to be extensive criminal stuffed companies for years.. In 2003 GW replaced into attempting to have reform on those over inflating finance companies. He had concearns for years extraordinarily approximately fannie and freddie, yet that replaced into no longer blasted throughout mainstream media replaced into it.. and sturdy previous barney frank replaced into quoted as asserting �those 2 entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — at the instant are not dealing with any style of economic disaster,� suggested consultant Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the score Democrat on the economic centers Committee. �The greater human beings exaggerate those issues, the greater tension there is on those companies, the fewer we are able to make certain in terms of low value housing.� That replaced right into a quote from 2003. Now we see that they have got been having issues then yet have been hiding it... sturdy accounting skills via top administration is the commencing up of this mess and something to the crooks who coated it up. GW tried to warn of the autumn of those companies, yet they weren't crashing down on the time so it replaced into brushed of. no person needs to hearken to while issues are sturdy.. they do no longer look at the destiny a techniques enought to make certain if the long term impact will help or harm our u . s . a ... those crooks who have been in value must be held to blame for his or her movements. shall we initiate there first.. And enable's basically face it if he tried to interrupt up a business employer like that come on particularly what do you think of might take place to all companies interior the U. S. that politicians think of are too enormous.. that should open the door to plenty capacity surpassed to government to make judgements on which business employer is permitted to strengthen or to be dissolved.. smart thinking..
2016-10-15 10:12:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I highly doubt it, he practically lives in washington and It's not a hanging state like Texas or oklahoma is, maybe lethal injection :)
2006-11-05 08:46:03 · answer #9 · answered by banana man234 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is a pity that the real war criminals are not brought to account. But maybe some day.
2006-11-05 08:44:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋