2006-11-05 07:26:02 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It is easier, more cost effective, and more powerful to have a single governing body that oversees ALL monopoly actions and behaviors.
Having more than one would lead to chaos and counter productive potential deadlocks i.e. one approves and one disapproves.
Such an incident would mean that more lawsuites would follow and further clog an already over loaded legal system.
2006-11-05 07:30:06 · answer #1 · answered by angelthe5th 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean they're the ones with a monopoly on monopolies ? Yes - down with the monopolistic monopolies commission!!!
2006-11-05 16:00:11 · answer #2 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
'Cos it is a monopoly silly!!!
2006-11-05 16:04:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you wait from Bush and his bad friends of war?
2006-11-05 15:32:43 · answer #4 · answered by Pedro M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good point!
2006-11-05 15:29:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋