Let us assume that we rent out x videos.
Therefore, for the first video shop, the cost is 15+2.5x.
For the second video shop, the cost is 5+3x.
Let us equate them so that the cost becomes equal.
15+2.5x=5+3x.
.5x=10
x=20
Therefore, you need to rent more than 20 videos from the first shop to make it more economical.
2006-11-05 06:17:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vijay_Srini 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The cost of joining the first club and renting n videos is
15 + 2.5n
the cost per video is then
(15 + 2.5n)/n
the cost of joining the second club and renting n videos is
5 + 3n
and the cost per video is
(5 + 3n)/n
What you want to know is, when will the unit cost for the first become less than the second, as n increases? Ie, as the number of videos you rent increases. So, let the first cost be less than the second:
(15 + 2.5n)/n < (5 + 3n) /n
and solve for an inequality in n. Your answer will be something like n > X.xxxx, and because you can't have a fraction of a video, round up to the nearest whole number.
2006-11-05 14:19:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by dm_cork 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are paying $10 extra for membership in the first club (i.e. $15 less $10) while you save 50 cents for every video rented from club one.
Hence, you need to rent in excess of 20 videos (i.e $10 divide by 50 cents) for the first club to me more economical.
Hope this helps
2006-11-05 14:18:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hotguy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
More economical, meaning afordable? 2.50 x 15=37.50
and 5 x 3=15
1st club: 15/2.50= 6 videos
2nd club: 5/3=1.6=2 , so most likely the 1st club
2006-11-05 14:19:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by DD 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
At 21 days, the club with the $15.00 membership fee becomes more economical. After renting videos for 21 days the $15.00 club cost goes to $67.50, while the $5.00 club cost rises to $68.00.
2006-11-05 14:30:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Preity 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
let x be the minimum number of videos you have to rent to make the first club more economical
$15+$2.5x<$5+$3x
$10<$0.5x
20
x>20
so you have to rent at least 21 videos to make the first club more economical...
2006-11-05 14:18:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Treat 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
15 + 2.5m = 5 + 3m
10 + 2.5m = 3m
10 = .5m
20 = m
m = 20
This sets them to equal. to make it economically correct you would have to rent one more video with the first, so 21 movies would have to be rented.
2006-11-05 14:26:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Blue Abyss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
15+2.5*x<5+3x
-0.5x<-10
0.5x>10
x>20
2006-11-05 14:21:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by raj 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
15+2.5x=y
5+3x=y
15+2.5x=5+3x
10=.5x
x=20
2006-11-05 14:16:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Luvitall 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
all I can say is ask a genius
2006-11-05 14:18:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋