Superb question.
Why one get sentenced for killing 148 and others get prseident's chair for killing even 1000 times more than saddam killed. Hate Bl00dy Bush hate Bl00dy blair; They should get beheadded 1000 times.
May God's curse be upon Bush and Blaire
2006-11-05 06:02:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Proud Muslim 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eloquently asked question!
If the situation were reversed, and Saddam Hussein had illegally and unconstitutionally attacked the U.S.A., then had 'caught' George W. Bush and put him on trial for high crimes against humanity, the citizens of this country would be in an outrage!
___________________________________________________
Check out the new blog: BUSHWACKER!
www.blogger.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________
What the Bush administration, our giant U.S. military- industrial complex, and corporate America has done - in collusion with the most incompetent, evil, arrogant, contemptible, cowardly, self-absorbed, corrupt Congress ins U.S. history - is despicable. Bush & Co. is responsible for 665,000 Iraqi deaths and almost 3,000 U.S. soldier deaths, not to mention the tens of thousands who are permanently injured, maimed, or disabled - all because the Bush family had a personal vendetta against Hussein and Cheney want all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands so he and his Exxon-Mobil buddies can get richer and richer and richer.
There are at least 750 people inside the beltway that should also be tried in an international tribunal for crimes agains humanity, and - if convicted - deserve to hang right alongside Hussein. -RKO-
2006-11-05 05:41:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
When Clinton is also tried for his war crimes against Iraq when he bombed them for a week straight in an operation called desert fox in December of 1998
and when we can try ignorant people for being ignorant and not knowing all the facts and not even trying to understand or know all the facts
2006-11-05 05:52:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by malfunction_r@sbcglobal.net 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only good answer to that is to show up at the polls on November 7th and vote DEMOCRAT across the ballot. Maybe then we can actually impeach and REMOVE a president from office for doing something illegal instead of impeaching the president for getting a BJ and not telling the truth about it. Grrr . . ..
2006-11-05 05:51:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by quatrapiller 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO they'd desire to no longer they have dedicated no war crimes.And katydid get off you damned soapbox undesirable stuff happens in war.i comprehend i replaced into there sixteen months.And as for torture i might torture, kill, or very almost something to guard my pals and family individuals or perhaps strangers from getting killed via rooster***t terrorist who sneak around somewhat of a head to head combat.
2016-10-21 07:39:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by janski 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they get tried for war crimes then you should be tried for ignorance....simple as that. I mean I didnt know that protecting and defending our country was a crime...wow I must be lost....LOL how much thought did you put into this post? None I would assume.....
2006-11-05 05:40:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by gwbgod 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
National Security is not a war crime .
2006-11-05 05:46:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
And I suppose you would like to be the only member of the Tribunal for all of them ? :-) lol sober up will ya
2006-11-05 05:42:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by pooterilgatto 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Good question. I'd like to know when impeachment proceedings will begin as well. God knows Bush deserves that much, at least.
2006-11-05 05:35:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think it is Tuesday Nov. 7th all across the U.S.
2006-11-05 05:37:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by taotemu 3
·
0⤊
2⤋