nah, i still hate him
2006-11-05 13:25:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by ##$SoulStryker$## 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam or no Saddam: the scandal of the preacher with a taste for meth and rent boys, has cast a rather long shadow on the White House. Bush has so many other things to account for in any case, and so much unfinished work on his plate.
Suppose for just a moment that there was no war in Iraq, and no threat of terrorism - wouldn't that make Bush another jobless spoilt rich boy, sitting in what was his Daddy's chair, after a dubious electoral win?
A lot of people dislike Bush, but like his buddy, yo-Blair, he won't even notice because, a lack of democracy has guaranteed a velvet-lined future for him and his children. So what do they care?
2006-11-05 05:06:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by montrealissima 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not a bit. Saddam is an evil man who deserves what he's getting. But we really needed to be going after those responsible for 9/11. We got the wrong guy.
2006-11-05 07:04:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by frenchy62 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not one tiny little bit more.
He's a raging lunatic that's just out to put dollars in his pockets and it's costing us the youth of America.....one soldier at a time.
Bush did not have the courage to stand up to the Saudi's and go after Bin Laden. You can see the oil running out of his eyes.
GOD bless our troops and shame on Bush for using them for his personal gain.
2006-11-05 05:03:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by emotional blonde 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've always thought of him as Curious George without the Man in th Yellow Hat. Still do.
2006-11-05 04:54:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Viewaskew 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
If Saddam is hanged, i think of Bush gets a lot of hardship. I consider what i think of you say - that many people will think of an identical punishment ought to receive to him, and a few of them will have an interest in carrying it out. by potential of truthful potential or foul! i do no longer think of that's a answer to the international's problems to kill people, and somewhat to no longer make an occasion of leaders by potential of killing them. i think of it is going to easily motivate greater killing. we ought to consistently in no way ignore that throughout warfare lots of the sufferers are infants, no longer merely by using fact they or their households are killed, yet by using fact they become in touch interior the conflict one way or yet another or quite psychologically damanged by potential of what they have witnessed. infants are day after today's adults, and we ought to consistently think of roughly what hardship we are construction ourselves for day after today.
2016-12-28 13:41:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't like him any better before or after. No difference to me. I'm still going to vote for Pat Paulsen for President, may he rest in peace!
http://www.paulsen.com/
2006-11-05 04:55:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I never have and never wil like George Bush, enough said.
2006-11-05 04:54:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by kim_in_craig 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No....But I've always liked Bush
2006-11-05 08:37:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes, G.W. Bush is still G.W. Bush
2006-11-05 04:54:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by justmejimw 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush is very loyal to his country & works hard trying to protect us. I applaud his work!
2006-11-05 04:53:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by TM 4
·
0⤊
2⤋