is he not responsible for sectarian violence in iraq?
2006-11-05 04:40:59 · 15 answers · asked by nightingale 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
by mistake i typed 2587 iraqis. it should be read as 600000 iraqis.that figure 2587 is that of americans killed.
2006-11-06 16:56:05 · update #1
i think investigations by the UN and Hague officials should be carried out. no way that's gonna happen tho. GW and his merry band of war profiteers will get away Scott free. they'll gleefully take their blood money and live in the rest of their evil lives in the luxury to which they've become accustomed. GW's arrogant smirk isn't on his dullard face for no reason.
2006-11-05 04:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by nebtet 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Iran,Syria, And Al Quiada are behind the violence. The Iraq war was by far the cleanest war with regards to civilian loses. We did everything we could to not harm civilians. Your idea of peace at any cost will leave us vulnerable to more attacks.They planned the 911 attacks while we were at peace. Can't you see this is a different beast in a different world. Being nice to a killer wont keep you safe. It just makes their task easier. Its best to have them fighting for their life in their back yard than having them killing you in yours.
2006-11-05 04:51:07 · answer #2 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well there will be more than that over the next couple of years .saddams been sentence to death and i can tell there will be a retalliation and more and more deaths will occur.saddam has still powerful people we don't know about running the steets over seas but we will see the hard way what will happen
2006-11-05 04:52:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you think every President who takes the US to war is a war criminal? Or is this bile you are spewing something you reserve specially for Bush?
Just vote.
2006-11-05 04:45:08 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
What are you suggesting? Are you one of those crazy people that want Saddam to go free? Give me a break. Bush has done nothing wrong. You need to be informed before posting such ignorance.
2006-11-05 04:46:16 · answer #5 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Well, technically, he is in the midst of an illegal (non-delcared) war...because Congress never officially passed any documented instances of a Declaration of War. However, no one is going to put an American president on trial for war crimes, no matter how unjust as it may seem.
2006-11-05 04:45:04 · answer #6 · answered by crissymm5 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Amazing how the most powerful man in the world is apparently not responsible for anything.
2006-11-05 04:43:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
So your saying we shouldn't try and stop people who are committing genocide? Maybe we should just leave Darfur alone, maybe no one should have intervened during the holocaust
2006-11-05 04:45:51 · answer #8 · answered by Libs are NERDS 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
A murderer is a murderer. Hussein and Dubya are both murderers. Excuses won't make Dubya less murderer.
2006-11-05 05:40:03 · answer #9 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
sure he is responsible... One country's freedom fighter is another country's terrorist!
but I dont think we ever get to see him jailed! not everybody face justice in this world.
2006-11-05 04:49:57 · answer #10 · answered by OVEE 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋