Humans and bananas share genetic similarities?

Question

Is this true? I can't find any evidence to back it up. Is it just some crap people are spouting to make the similarity between human and chimpanzee genes seem irrelevant?

Answer 1

This is not an idle claim.

W.r.t. that specific claim about similarities between the DNA of humans and bananas in particular, I found both creationist and scientific references that attribute that quote to distinguished UK Zoologist, Sir Robert May in New Scientist magazine (July 1, 2000). Unfortunately, I'm not a subscriber to the magazine so I can't get the full article.

But I found a nice article that explains well what it means when we talk about (and quantify) similarities between human and plant DNA. For example, the author (geneticist Flo Pauli from Stanford) shows side-by-side human and plant genetic sequences for a protein used in cell respiration found in both plants and animals. The similarities are shown in red and you can see that there are lots of differences, but also a lot of long sequences in common.

http://www.thetech.org/genetics/ask.php?id=83

This does not make the human and chimp similarities irrelevant at all ... it strengthens the idea that *all* living life forms are related by common descent. The more recent the common ancestor, the higher the percentage of shared DNA. This is completely independent evidence of the theory of evolution, which was formulated long before DNA was discovered.

Answer 2

This is true to an extent. All organisms have genetic similarities. Every organism use adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine for their DNA bases and all organisms use adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil for their four RNA bases. This includes all life. Narrowing down to eukaryotes (which includes all organisms with nucleated cells, such as plants and animals) all of thes organisms basically have identical DNA repair, DNA replication, translation, transcription mechanisms. This means that plants and animals have similar genetic sequences that code for the enzymes responsible for those processes. Also due to common ancestry from a progenitor eukaryotic cell plants and animals have a number of other proteins in common such as actin.

So there are similarities between plants and animals in the genetic code, but the similarities are nowhere near as much as that between chimps and humans. Chimps and humans differ very little in their genetic code (about 2%) and most of the differences are involved in skull development and smell.

Answer 3

All living organisms share MANY genetic similarities, many of the differences are in expression and missing or added genetic information. This does not make the similarity between humans and any organism irrelevant, it just supports the idea that we all have similar genetic mechanisms.

Answer 4

a million. definite, all residing issues proportion a typical ancestor. the main up-tp-date common ancestor of human beings and bananas lived greater suitable than 2 billion years in the past. Your "common experience" is geared up on your adventure with common activities and products and a time scale of no longer a quantity hundred years. you at the instant are not familiar with variations in gene frequency by using the years scales of 1000's of hundreds of thousands of years. 2. Your remark approximately "small minded evolutionist" seems to be an attempt to stereotype human beings. If this could nicely be a habit with you, this is recommended to be greater careful interior the destiny. 3. you have puzzled evolution with abiogenesis. The question of ways existence arose has no longer something regardless of to do with evolution. 4. Morphological and anatomical similarities of residing varieties are basically one line of info for evolution. the different 3 crucial lines are biogeography, genetics, and the fossil record. once you have thoroughly studied those disciplines, you would be in a greater physically powerful place to refute Darwin and the tens of 1000's of adult men and ladies who've committed their lives over the final one hundred fifty years to getting to renowned how the residing worldwide got here to be as this is. 5. What do you're making of a better intelligence that creates species with maximum of flaws? case in point, in guy the recurrent laryngeal nerve descends from the recommendations, bypasses its purpose organ, the larynx, enters the chest, wraps around the aorta, and then ascends back into the neck the place it reaches the larynx. This association is organic nonsense until eventually you communicate approximately the posterior stream of the main blood vessel that trapped the laryngeal nerve in the back of it and finally grew to grow to be the aorta in guy. Clue: you realize massively under you think of you do. show your self, or come across a school to do it.

Answer 5

Yes. Humans and bananas can both be eaten by monkeys and other primates.

Answer 6

I not sure, but, have used a Banana on my woman for fun and it did seem to have the same effects as if it had been me.
OK, just kidding, maybe! ;-D

Answer 7

I heard that scientific claim too, it's actually true.