How could we sit back and let a 69 year old person be sentanced to death? We only hear what the goverment want us to hear, may be he was not as bad of a person that we have been made to believe. I and many other people think that it should be Bush that should face crimes as he as killed many more people than Saddam Hussean as meant to have. This is all wrong and I am praying for Saddam Hussein right now and hope for his release on appeal. After all he is not the killer it is Bush.
2006-11-05 02:06:19 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
you are totally correct i am glad there is someone else out there that feels the same way about this, ive got a very bad feeling about it and fear far worse repercussions than anyone could imagine
2006-11-05 02:11:16 · answer #1 · answered by pseudoname 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Boy- what a push button question- You may not like Bush but to compare him to someone who chemically murdered whole villages ,who's sons pick out little girls walking to school,have their men grab them, rape and then murder them? The Olympic athletes that he put (the son) in a coffin box when they didn't win-the people that disappeared in the night. Saddams "hero" was Hitler- also a brilliant and crazy man, who saw people as tools and things, and cared for no one and killed thousands. Why are not all our allies in the war to blame too? I suppose that war makes you a murderer-it sucks and I wish wars would never happen but Saddam is a sadistic crazy person.
PS- This was the choice of his people, the whole idea was to let them judge and jury him- we would never hear the end of it if America did it. I think a firing squad would be quicker but- hey?!
2006-11-05 02:22:57 · answer #2 · answered by ARTmom 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course he shouldn't hang. He should be President of Iraq. He was deposed by an illegal invasion that was launched on false the pretext of WMD and Al-Quaida connections, which the Americans now say was false intelligence. It was not false intelligence, it was lies, and every intelligent person from Hans Blix down recognised this fact. And before the mamby-pamby wishy-washy liberals amongst you go for the thumbs down button, just think in terms of cost, both material and humanitarian that this debacle has cost. Why ? Re-elect George W and give his gung-ho lackey in Downing Street a shot a history. The bottom line is that some Iraqis would not be happy if Sadaam were still in power, but a lot more of them would be alive !
2006-11-05 03:32:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The problem is that Mr. Bush and his mates are better in hiding the damage they do and did to other people.
A death sentence is by my opinion not the best way of dealing with people like them any way.
First of all you are lowering yourself to the same level of taking someones live, and secondly you are helping them to escape of facing the terror they caused.
Maybe they can let them both change nappies for the rest of their lives in a elderly home side by side.
Can you imagine those two creeps in a nurses uniform.
2006-11-05 09:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by remi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't get that. Saddam Hussein signed the death warrants of millions of innocent people. He does not deserve to live. I agree that Bush is an idiot, but Hussein is a horrible man.
2006-11-05 02:09:32 · answer #5 · answered by uk_lad_2003 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
And now you're basically pointing out the crimes Pres. Bush made being revealed interior the information, while all his crimes would be interior the information he will probable kill himself. nonetheless i think of that a dying sentence isn't possibly the main actual looking way of punishing, what you do is unquestionably the comparable as they do or did. cleansing nappies in a elderly residing house for the the remainder of his existence may be a bigger punishment then enable them to depart this international and not dealing with up with what they brought about.
2016-10-21 07:27:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then you are a seriously warped person. Many of the Iraqi people have testified against Saddam. They have witnessed the brutal killings brought upon by his soldiers order by Saddam. Saddam has ADMITTED to his method as a justifiable means of control. I suggest you further your research into the history of Saddam. Perhaps you will change your views.
2006-11-05 02:15:49 · answer #7 · answered by S H 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
One thing is for sure, those who didn't agree to the occupation of Iraq, can't agree to Saddam having been put on trial, whatever the verdict. Because, if they had had their way he would still be in power.
2006-11-08 08:01:37 · answer #8 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is not on trial.
Whether Bush should be on trial or not is another question.
Hussain is a murderer, and deserves the death sentence, no question about it.
there may be repercussions, but there will probably also be repercussions if he is allowed to live (people being kidnapped and their lives offered in exchange for that murderer)
2006-11-05 02:19:04 · answer #9 · answered by SeabourneFerriesLtd 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm... the people of Iraq found him guilty of crimes. I haven't followed the trial too closely, but the mass graves they keep uncovering might have something to do with it.
And when George Bush is found to have murdered his own countrymen and buried them in mass graves, I'll be happy to support his trial too.
2006-11-05 02:17:10 · answer #10 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
H e should die like any other murdering criminal, no life imprisonment....death to a killer. Bush maybe a killer as you say, but not on Saddams scale!!!!!
2006-11-05 02:11:42 · answer #11 · answered by kelly709904 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋