The root of all evil, they did it for the money.
2006-11-05 02:13:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Aku 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
They still want to cash in on the popularity of the Bond movies and the original was not a Bond film. I think it is the only Fleming book they have not made a Bond film from
2006-11-05 10:03:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Maid Angela 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The original was a 1 hour b&w for television with an American actor Barry Sullivan. Then they made a satirical comedy with many actors in it. This is the first real attempt at the origianl storyline ever.
2006-11-05 10:02:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by cadaholic 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
the film is not a remake it was the first bond to be filmed for tv only this is the first time has been seen on the big screen.
2006-11-05 15:06:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As if the 1967 version had anything to do with a real Bond movie
2006-11-05 10:01:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because the original film of it was (a) not part of the official Bond franchise, and (b) one of the worst films ever made.
2006-11-05 11:10:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thought it is because sequels (and remakes of popular oldies) usually make more money (profit - not necessarily gross more) than the originals.
.
2006-11-05 10:06:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by DM 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The old version was not a REAL 007 one , it was more of a spoof with a lot of comic actors in it and 007 died in that one
2006-11-05 10:11:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
because no one believed peter sellars and david niven in the first one
2006-11-05 10:03:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
did you watch the first attempt,it was a load of bollocks.
2006-11-05 10:28:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋